HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Procaine compared with lidocaine for incidence of transient neurologic symptoms.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) have been reported to occur after 16% to 40% of ambulatory lidocaine spinal anesthetics. Patient discomfort and the possibility of underlying lidocaine neurotoxicity have prompted a search for alternative local anesthetic agents. We compared the incidence of TNS with procaine or lidocaine spinal anesthesia in a 2:1 dose ratio.
METHODS:
Seventy outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy were blindly randomized to receive either 100 mg hyperbaric procaine or 50 mg hyperbaric lidocaine. An interview by a blinded investigator established the presence or absence of TNS, defined as pain in the buttocks or lower extremities beginning within 24 hours of surgery. Onset of sensory and motor block, patient discomfort, supplemental anesthetics, and side effects were recorded by the unblinded managing anesthesia team. Anesthetic adequacy was determined from these data by a single blinded investigator. Hospital discharge time was recorded from the patient record. Groups were compared using appropriate statistics with a P < .05 considered significant.
RESULTS:
TNS occurred in 6% of procaine patients versus 31% of lidocaine patients (P = .007). Sensory block with procaine and lidocaine was similar, while motor block was decreased with procaine (P < .05). A trend toward a higher rate of block inadequacy (17% v 3%, P = .11) and intraoperative nausea (17% v 3%, P = .11) occurred with procaine. Average hospital discharge time with procaine was increased by 29 minutes (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS:
The incidence of TNS was substantially lower with procaine than with lidocaine. However, procaine resulted in a lower overall quality of anesthesia and a prolonged average discharge time. If the shortfalls of procaine as studied can be overcome, it may provide a suitable alternative to lidocaine for outpatient spinal anesthesia to minimize the risk of TNS.
AuthorsP S Hodgson, S S Liu, M S Batra, T W Gras, J E Pollock, J M Neal
JournalRegional anesthesia and pain medicine (Reg Anesth Pain Med) 2000 May-Jun Vol. 25 Issue 3 Pg. 218-22 ISSN: 1098-7339 [Print] England
PMID10834773 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Procaine
  • Lidocaine
Topics
  • Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
  • Anesthesia, Spinal (adverse effects)
  • Anesthetics, Local (adverse effects)
  • Arthroscopy
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee (surgery)
  • Leg (surgery)
  • Lidocaine (adverse effects)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurotoxicity Syndromes (physiopathology, prevention & control)
  • Procaine (adverse effects)
  • Prospective Studies

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: