HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Impact of Gleason pattern 5 on prognosis for newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥8.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
We evaluated the impact of Gleason pattern 5 presence on prognosis among de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients with a Gleason score ≥8.
METHODS:
The data of 559 patients diagnosed as metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with a Gleason score ≥8, who were initially treated with androgen deprivation therapy from 2008 to 2016, were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into two groups as high and low volume based on the CHAARTED trial criteria.
RESULTS:
The median overall survival of the 559 metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients with Gleason score ≥8 was 70 months, with a median follow-up period of 36 months. Gleason pattern 5 was confirmed in 341 patients (61.0%), in which primary Gleason pattern 5 was confirmed in 164 patients (29.3%). The number of patients with high metastatic volume group was 363 (64.9%). In total and high metastatic volume groups, hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase were significant factors for predicting overall survival, but both Gleason pattern 5 and primary Gleason pattern 5 did not show a statistically significant difference. In the low-volume metastatic group, the median overall survival in patients with or without primary Gleason pattern 5 was 40 and 78 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only primary Gleason pattern 5 was an independent predictive factor for overall survival in the low-volume metastatic group (hazard ratio 2.76, 95% confidence interval 1.88-8.67; P = 0.0026).
CONCLUSION:
The presence of Gleason pattern 5 was not associated with overall survival in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with a Gleason score ≥8. In low-metastatic volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, primary Gleason pattern 5 was a poor prognostic factor, which might show a separate treatment option for this group.
AuthorsKento Morozumi, Koji Mitsuzuka, Shintaro Narita, Masahiro Takahashi, Sadafumi Kawamura, Tatsuo Tochigi, Yoichi Arai, Senji Hoshi, Jiro Shimoda, Shigeto Ishidoya, Teppei Okamoto, Shingo Hatakeyama, Toshihiko Sakurai, Norihiko Tsuchiya, Chikara Ohyama, Tomonori Habuchi, Akihiro Ito
JournalInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association (Int J Urol) Vol. 29 Issue 4 Pg. 324-331 (04 2022) ISSN: 1442-2042 [Electronic] Australia
PMID35042278 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article)
Copyright© 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.
Chemical References
  • Androgen Antagonists
  • Hormones
Topics
  • Androgen Antagonists (therapeutic use)
  • Hormones
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Prognosis
  • Prostatic Neoplasms (pathology)
  • Retrospective Studies

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: