HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Jurisdictional differences in opioid use, other licit and illicit drug use, and harms associated with substance use among people who tamper with pharmaceutical opioids.

AbstractINTRODUCTION AND AIMS:
The harms associated with non-medical use of pharmaceutical opioid analgesics are well established; however, less is known about the characteristics and drug-use patterns of the growing and hidden populations of people using pharmaceutical opioids illicitly, including the frequency of pharmaceutical opioid injection. This paper aimed to undertake a detailed examination of jurisdictional differences in patterns of opioid use among a cohort of people who regularly tamper with pharmaceutical opioids in Australia.
DESIGN AND METHODS:
Data were drawn from the National Opioid Medications Abuse Deterrence study. The cohort was recruited from New South Wales (NSW; n = 303), South Australia (SA; n = 150) and Tasmania (TAS; n = 153) to participate in face-to-face structured interviews collecting data on use of pharmaceutical opioids, benzodiazepines, other sedative drugs and illicit substances, as well as the harms associated with substance use.
RESULTS:
TAS participants reported greater use and injection of certain pharmaceutical opioids (particularly morphine and methadone tablets), and limited heroin use, with lower rates of engagement in opioid substitution treatment, compared with NSW participants. NSW participants were more socially disadvantaged and more likely to report risky injecting behaviours and injecting-related injuries and diseases compared with SA and TAS participants. SA participants reported greater rates of pain conditions, greater use of pain-based services, as well as broader use of pharmaceutical opioids in regards to forms and route of administration, compared with NSW participants.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
Distinct jurisdictional profiles were evident for people who tamper with pharmaceutical opioids, potentially reflecting jurisdictional differences in prescribing regulatory mechanisms and addiction treatment models.
AuthorsAmy Peacock, Raimondo Bruno, Elena Cama, Ivana Kihas, Briony Larance, Nick Lintzeris, Antonia Hordern, Nancy White, Robert Ali, Louisa Degenhardt
JournalDrug and alcohol review (Drug Alcohol Rev) Vol. 34 Issue 6 Pg. 611-22 (Nov 2015) ISSN: 1465-3362 [Electronic] Australia
PMID26084592 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2015 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.
Chemical References
  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Oxycodone
Topics
  • Adult
  • Alcoholism (epidemiology)
  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Methods
  • Morphine Dependence (epidemiology)
  • New South Wales (epidemiology)
  • Opioid-Related Disorders (epidemiology)
  • Oxycodone
  • Pain (drug therapy, epidemiology)
  • Prescription Drug Misuse (statistics & numerical data)
  • South Australia (epidemiology)
  • Substance Abuse, Intravenous (epidemiology)
  • Tasmania (epidemiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: