Direct Oral Anticoagulants and the Paradigm Shift in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism.

Abstract

The advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has revolutionized anticoagulation management in both stroke prevention and venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment/prevention. Clinical trials and secondary real-world data have shown that DOACs have similar efficacy and, in some cases, improved bleeding safety profiles compared with vitamin K antagonists. Together with benefits of patient convenience, this has shifted the risk-benefit ratio toward long-term anticoagulation. However, current VTE risk assessment models are based on vitamin K antagonists and do not take into account the new paradigm of DOACs. Therefore, challenges to the thrombosis community remain to determine patients who would benefit from long-term anticoagulation in the DOAC era. Here, the authors review the current literature on risks and benefits of DOACs and their potential role in long-term VTE thromboprophylaxis as well as in current risk assessment models. The increasing use of DOACs, led by their convenience of use and generally lower bleeding rates, calls for a reevaluation of the current models as the benefits of long-term anticoagulation may begin to outweigh risks and inconvenience associated with their predecessors.

• Authors: Hui Yin Lim, Harshal Nandurkar, Prahlad Ho
• Journal: Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis (Semin Thromb Hemost) Vol. 44 Issue 3 Pg. 261-266 (Apr 2018) ISSN: 1098-9064 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 29558778 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
• Copyright: Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Chemical References

• Anticoagulants

Topics

• Administration, Oral
• Anticoagulants (pharmacology, therapeutic use)
• Humans
• Venous Thromboembolism (drug therapy, pathology)