HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Skincare products containing low concentrations of formaldehyde detected by the chromotropic acid method cannot be safely used in formaldehyde-allergic patients.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Formaldehyde is a well-known contact sensitizer. Formaldehyde releasers are widely used preservatives in skincare products. It has been found that formaldehyde at concentrations allowed by the European Cosmetics Directive can cause allergic contact dermatitis. However, we still lack information on whether formaldehyde at low concentrations affects dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals.
OBJECTIVES:
To study the effects of low concentrations of formaldehyde on irritant contact dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals.
METHODS:
Fifteen formaldehyde-allergic individuals and a control group of 12 individuals without contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers were included in the study. The individuals performed the repeated open application test (ROAT) during 4 weeks with four different moisturizers releasing formaldehyde in concentrations that had been determined as > 40, 20-40, 2·5-10 and 0 p.p.m. by the chromotropic acid (CA) spot test. Dimethyloldimethylhydantoin was used as a formaldehyde releaser in the moisturizers. The ROAT was performed on areas of experimentally induced sodium lauryl sulfate dermatitis. The study was double blind, controlled and randomized.
RESULTS:
Nine of the 15 formaldehyde-allergic individuals had reappearance or worsening of dermatitis on the areas that were treated with moisturizers containing formaldehyde. No such reactions were observed in the control group (P < 0·001) or for the moisturizers without formaldehyde in the formaldehyde-allergic individuals (P < 0·001).
CONCLUSIONS:
Our results demonstrate that the low concentrations of formaldehyde often found in skincare products by the CA method are sufficient to worsen an existing dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals.
AuthorsI Hauksson, A Pontén, B Gruvberger, M Isaksson, M Engfeldt, M Bruze
JournalThe British journal of dermatology (Br J Dermatol) Vol. 174 Issue 2 Pg. 371-9 (Feb 2016) ISSN: 1365-2133 [Electronic] England
PMID26480304 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2015 British Association of Dermatologists.
Chemical References
  • Cosmetics
  • Naphthalenesulfonates
  • Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
  • Formaldehyde
  • chromotropic acid
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Colorimetry (methods)
  • Cosmetics (adverse effects, chemistry)
  • Dermatitis, Irritant (etiology)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Hypersensitivity (etiology)
  • Female
  • Formaldehyde (adverse effects, analysis)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Naphthalenesulfonates (metabolism)
  • Patch Tests
  • Preservatives, Pharmaceutical (adverse effects, analysis)
  • Skin Care (adverse effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: