HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Cheek Tooth Extraction Via a Minimally Invasive Transbuccal Approach and Intradental Screw Placement in 54 Equids.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To describe (1) preoperative findings and surgical technique, (2) intraoperative difficulties, and (3) postoperative complications and long-term outcome of equine cheek tooth extraction using a minimally invasive transbuccal screw extraction (MITSE) technique.
STUDY DESIGN:
Retrospective case series.
ANIMALS:
Fifty-four equids; 50 horses, 3 ponies, and 1 mule.
METHODS:
Fifty-eight MITSE procedures were performed to extract cheek teeth in 54 equids. Peri- and intraoperative difficulties, as well as short- (<1 month) and long-term (>6 months) postoperative complications were recorded. Followup information was obtained through telephone interviews, making specific inquiries about nasal discharge, facial asymmetry, and findings consistent with surgical site infection.
RESULTS:
Preoperative findings that prompted exodontia included 50 cheek teeth with apical infections, 48 fractures, 4 neoplasia, 2 displacements, and 1 supernumerary tooth. Previous oral extraction was attempted but had failed in 55/58 (95%) animals because of cheek tooth fracture in 28, or insufficient clinical crown for extraction with forceps in 27. MITSE was successful in removing the entire targeted dental structure in 47/58 (81%) procedures. However, MITSE failed to remove the entire targeted dental structure in 11/58 (19%) procedures and was followed by repulsion in 10/11 (91%). Short-term postoperative complications included bleeding (4/58 procedures, 7%) and transient facial nerve paralysis (4/58 procedures, 7%). Owners were satisfied with the functional and cosmetic outcome for 40/41 (98%) animals with followup.
CONCLUSION:
MITSE offers an alternate for cheek tooth extraction in equids, where conventional oral extraction is not possible or has failed. Overall, there was low morbidity, which compares favorably with invasive buccotomy or repulsion techniques.
AuthorsFrederik Langeneckert, Thomas Witte, Frank Schellenberger, Christian Czech, David Aebischer, Beatriz Vidondo, Christoph Koch
JournalVeterinary surgery : VS (Vet Surg) Vol. 44 Issue 8 Pg. 1012-20 (Nov 2015) ISSN: 1532-950X [Electronic] United States
PMID26455833 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© Copyright 2015 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Topics
  • Animals
  • Bicuspid (surgery)
  • Bone Screws (veterinary)
  • Equidae (surgery)
  • Female
  • Horses (surgery)
  • Intraoperative Complications (veterinary)
  • Male
  • Molar (surgery)
  • Postoperative Complications (veterinary)
  • Preoperative Care (veterinary)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tooth Extraction (veterinary)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: