HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Two commonly used methods of digital nerve block with local anesthetic are the two-injection dorsal technique and the single-injection volar subcutaneous technique. The authors compared these two digital block techniques with respect to local anesthetic injection pain and recipient preference of anesthetic technique.
METHODS:
Twenty-seven volunteers had the long finger of each hand injected with 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The two-injection dorsal method was used on one long finger and the other long finger received the volar single-injection technique. Volunteers completed a pain scale for each block and were then asked which technique they would prefer. The area of anesthetic skin was assessed in each finger by pinprick testing, and photographs were taken.
RESULTS:
Although there was a lower pain score for the volar single-injection block, the difference in pain scores between the two techniques was not statistically significant. However, 22 of the 27 subjects indicated that they would select the volar over the dorsal block if a future block was required, and this preference for the volar block was statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS:
Although the difference in pain scores between the two techniques was not statistically significant, volunteers who received both blocks would prefer the volar single-injection subcutaneous block if given a choice. Therefore, the single-injection volar subcutaneous block is recommended as the technique of choice for anesthesia of the digit, except in patients for whom anesthesia over the dorsum of the proximal phalanx is required. These patients may prefer a supplementary dorsal nerve block or a traditional two-injection block.
AuthorsJason G Williams, Donald H Lalonde
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery (Plast Reconstr Surg) Vol. 118 Issue 5 Pg. 1195-1200 (Oct 2006) ISSN: 1529-4242 [Electronic] United States
PMID17016190 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Anesthetics, Local
Topics
  • Adult
  • Anesthetics, Local (administration & dosage)
  • Female
  • Fingers (innervation)
  • Humans
  • Injections, Subcutaneous (adverse effects, methods, psychology)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nerve Block (methods, psychology)
  • Pain (etiology, prevention & control)
  • Pain Measurement
  • Patient Satisfaction

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: