HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Mechanism of cytotoxicity of 5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolic acid in human ovarian carcinoma cells in vitro and modulation of the drug activity by folic or folinic acid.

Abstract
Inhibition of clonogenic potential by the glycinamideribonucleosyl transformylase inhibitor 5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolic acid (DDATHF, Lometrexol) was evaluated in vitro in a human ovarian carcinoma cell line, SW626. Drug-induced inhibition of clonogenic potential is a function of the dose and time of exposure and is independent of the formation of DNA single-strand breaks or de novo synthesis of protein. Simultaneous treatment with 100 microM hypoxanthine completely prevented the inhibition of clonogenic potential caused by 0.5 microM DDATHF. DDATHF blocked cells in the early-middle S-phases of the cell cycle, and there was a corresponding marked reduction in the rate of DNA synthesis after drug withdrawal. The cytotoxic potential of DDATHF was modulated by the folic acid concentration present in the medium. In a medium containing 0.22 microM folic acid, DDATHF cytotoxicity was at least 100 times that in a regular medium containing 2.22 microM folic acid, levels which, however, are about 100 times those found in human plasma. DDATHF cytotoxicity differed moderately when folic acid concentrations varied between 0.22 and 0 microM, suggesting that folic acid does not necessarily antagonise DDATHF anti-tumour activity. Folinic acid at a concentration as low as 0.1 microM can completely rescue cells when given simultaneously with 0.5 microM DDATHF. When folinic acid was given 24 h after DDATHF, a reversal of cytotoxicity was observed at 0.5 and 1 microM, but to a much lesser extent than simultaneous treatment. When folinic acid was added after 48 or 72 h of DDATHF washout, even at a high concentration and for a long time, no reduction in DDATHF cytotoxicity was found. In conclusion, the study highlights the modulation of DDATHF cytotoxicity by folic acid or by folinic acid and provides further rationale for in vivo clinical investigation with these combinations.
AuthorsE Erba, S Sen, C Sessa, F L Vikhanskaya, M D'Incalci
JournalBritish journal of cancer (Br J Cancer) Vol. 69 Issue 2 Pg. 205-11 (Feb 1994) ISSN: 0007-0920 [Print] England
PMID8297715 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • DNA, Neoplasm
  • Folic Acid Antagonists
  • Hypoxanthines
  • Tetrahydrofolates
  • Hypoxanthine
  • lometrexol
  • Folic Acid
  • Leucovorin
  • Thymidine
Topics
  • Antineoplastic Agents (administration & dosage, antagonists & inhibitors, pharmacology)
  • Cell Cycle (drug effects)
  • DNA, Neoplasm (biosynthesis, drug effects)
  • Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor
  • Female
  • Folic Acid (pharmacology)
  • Folic Acid Antagonists (administration & dosage, pharmacology)
  • Humans
  • Hypoxanthine
  • Hypoxanthines (metabolism)
  • Leucovorin (pharmacology)
  • Ovarian Neoplasms (metabolism, pathology)
  • Tetrahydrofolates (administration & dosage, antagonists & inhibitors, pharmacology)
  • Thymidine (biosynthesis)
  • Time Factors
  • Tumor Cells, Cultured (metabolism, pathology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: