HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

High protein versus medium protein delivery under equal total energy delivery in critical care: A randomized controlled trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Appropriate protein delivery amounts during the acute phase of critical care are unknown. Along with nutrition, early mobilization and the combination are important. We conducted a randomized controlled trial during critical care to assess high-protein and medium-protein delivery under equal total energy delivery with and without active early rehabilitation.
METHODS:
ICU patients of August 2018-September 2019 were allocated to a high-protein group (target energy 20 kcal/kg/day, protein 1.8 g/kg/day) or a medium-protein group (target energy 20 kcal/kg/day, protein 0.9 g/kg/day) with the same nutrition protocol by day 10. By dividing the study period, standard rehabilitation was administered during the initial period. Rehabilitation with belt-type electrical muscle stimulation was given from day 2 in the latter as a historical comparison. Femoral muscle volume was evaluated on day 1 and day 10 using computed tomography.
RESULTS:
This study analyzed 117 eligible patients with similar characteristics assigned to a high-protein or medium-protein group. Total energy delivery was around 20 kcal/kg/day in both groups, but protein delivery was 1.5 g/kg/day and 0.8 g/kg/day. As a primary outcome, femoral muscle volume loss was 12.9 ± 8.5% in the high-protein group and 16.9 ± 7.0% in the medium-protein group, with significant difference (p = 0.0059). Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome were significantly less frequent in the high-protein group. Muscle volume loss was significantly less in the high-protein group only during the electrical muscle stimulation period.
CONCLUSIONS:
For critical care, high protein delivery provided better muscle volume maintenance, but only with active early rehabilitation.
REGISTRATION:
University Hospital Medical Information Network, UMIN000033783 Registered on 16 Aug 2018. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000038538.
AuthorsKensuke Nakamura, Hidehiko Nakano, Hiromu Naraba, Masaki Mochizuki, Yuji Takahashi, Tomohiro Sonoo, Hideki Hashimoto, Naoto Morimura
JournalClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) (Clin Nutr) Vol. 40 Issue 3 Pg. 796-803 (03 2021) ISSN: 1532-1983 [Electronic] England
PMID32800385 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
CopyrightCopyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Dietary Proteins
Topics
  • Aged
  • Critical Care
  • Dietary Proteins (administration & dosage)
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy
  • Energy Intake
  • Enteral Nutrition
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Male
  • Muscle, Skeletal (pathology)
  • Muscular Atrophy (pathology)
  • Parenteral Nutrition

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: