HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A Phase Ib Study to Evaluate the MEK Inhibitor Cobimetinib in Combination with the ERK1/2 Inhibitor GDC-0994 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

AbstractLESSONS LEARNED:
Despite strong preclinical rationale, combined cobimetinib-mediated MEK inhibition and GDC-0994-mediated ERK inhibition was not tolerable on two 28-day dosing schedules in which GDC-0994 was given for 21 days continuously and cobimetinib administered over 21 days either continuously or intermittently. Adverse events were as expected for mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway inhibition, but overlapping and cumulative toxicities could not be managed on either dosing schedule. Pharmacokinetic parameters of cobimetinib and GDC-0994 given in combination were similar to those previously observed in monotherapy studies, so that there was no evidence of drug-drug interaction. Cycle 1 metabolic responses were observed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography but were not predictive of outcome measured by RECIST 1.1.
BACKGROUND:
Simultaneous targeting of multiple nodes in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway offers the prospect of enhanced activity in RAS-RAF-mutant tumors. This phase Ib trial evaluated the combination of cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor) and GDC-0994 (ERK inhibitor) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
METHODS:
Cobimetinib and GDC-0994 were administered orally on two separate dosing schedules. Arm A consisted of concurrent cobimetinib and GDC-0994 once daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle; Arm B consisted of intermittent dosing of cobimetinib on a 28-day cycle concurrent with GDC-0994 daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle.
RESULTS:
In total, 24 patients were enrolled. For Arm A, owing to cumulative grade 1-2 toxicity, the dose of cobimetinib was decreased. For Arm B, dose increases of GDC-0994 and cobimetinib were intolerable with grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities of myocardial infarction and rash. Pharmacokinetic data did not show evidence of a drug-drug interaction. Overall, seven patients had a best overall response of stable disease (SD) and one patient with pancreatic adenocarcinoma had an unconfirmed partial response.
CONCLUSION:
The safety profile of MEK and ERK inhibition demonstrated classic MAPK inhibitor-related adverse events (AEs). However, overlapping AEs and cumulative toxicity could not be adequately managed on either dosing schedule, restricting the ability to further develop this combination.
AuthorsColin Weekes, Albert Lockhart, Patricia LoRusso, Elaine Murray, Erica Park, Mike Tagen, Jatinder Singh, Indrani Sarkar, Lars Mueller, Hatem Dokainish, Geoffrey Shapiro, Howard Burris
JournalThe oncologist (Oncologist) Vol. 25 Issue 10 Pg. 833-e1438 (10 2020) ISSN: 1549-490X [Electronic] England
PMID32311798 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase I, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.
Chemical References
  • Azetidines
  • Piperidines
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors
  • Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
  • cobimetinib
Topics
  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Azetidines
  • Humans
  • MAP Kinase Signaling System
  • Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
  • Neoplasms (drug therapy)
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Piperidines
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors (adverse effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: