Abstract | OBJECTIVE: METHODS: RESULTS: There were significant differences in 5-year DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.59, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.15-2.19; P=0.005] and LRR (HR=3.33, 95% CI, 1.51-7.34; P=0.003), whereas there were no significant differences in OS and DMR between ET group and ET+RT group. In luminal A type, there was no significant difference in 5-year DFS, LRR, OS and DMR between ET group and ET+RT group. In luminal B type, there were statistically significant differences in 5-year DFS (HR=2.19, 95% CI, 1.37-3.49; P=0.001), LRR (HR=5.45, 95% CI, 1.65-17.98; P=0.005), and OS (HR=1.75, 95% CI, 1.01-3.05; P=0.048) between ET group and ET+RT group. In the ET group, there were significant differences between luminal A type and luminal B type in 5-year DFS (HR=1.84, 95% CI, 1.23-2.75; P=0.003) and OS (HR=1.76, 95% CI, 1.07-2.91; P=0.026). CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Xiangcheng Zhi, Xiaonan Yang, Teng Pan, Jingjing Liu, Xiao Chen, Liping Lou, Zhendong Shi, Jin Zhang |
Journal | Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu
(Chin J Cancer Res)
Vol. 31
Issue 3
Pg. 471-480
(Jun 2019)
ISSN: 1000-9604 [Print] China |
PMID | 31354216
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|