HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Inactivated and live bivalent fowl adenovirus (FAdV8b + FAdV11) breeder vaccines provide broad-spectrum protection in chicks against inclusion body hepatitis (IBH).

Abstract
Fowl adenovirus (FAdV) is comprised of five species (A to E) and 12 serotypes (1-7, 8a, 8b, 9-11). Inclusion body hepatitis (IBH) is caused by FAdV-7, 8a, 8b (species E) and FAdV-2 and 11 (species D). Commercial vaccines against IBH are not available in Canada. Autogenous FAdV broiler breeder vaccines are now used in some areas where outbreaks of IBH are occurring. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a bivalent (species D and E) live and an inactivated FAdV broiler breeder vaccine in protecting broiler chicks against IBH through maternal antibody (MtAb) transfer. FAdV seronegative broiler breeders (n = 300/group) received either a live or inactivated bivalent (FAdV-8b-SK + FAdV-11-1047) vaccine. The live vaccine (1 × 104 TCID50 of each virus/bird) was given orally once at 16 weeks of age and the inactivated vaccine (1 × 106TCID50 of each virus + 20% Emulsigen D) was given intramuscularly at 16 and 19 weeks of age. Controls (n = 150) were given saline orally. The inactivated vaccine group was boosted 3 weeks later with the same vaccine. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) in sera (n = 10) were detected at 19, 22, 30 and 48 weeks of age. NAb were able to neutralize various FAdV serotypes within species D and E. Mean NAb were similar in the both live and killed vaccine groups at 19, 30 and 48 weeks and ranged from 2.4 to 3.7 log10. Approximately 26 ± 7% of MtAbs were passively transferred through eggs to day-old chicks. Progeny challenged with a lethal dose (1 × 107 TCID50/bird intramuscularly) of FAdV-8b-SK, FAdV-11-1047, or FAdV-2-685 (n = 90/group) at 14 days post-hatch (dph) showed 98-100% protection in broiler chicks to homologous or heterologous FAdV challenges. Our data suggests that a bivalent live and an inactivated FAdV vaccine are equally effective and have the potential for the control of IBH.
AuthorsAshish Gupta, Shelly Popowich, Davor Ojkic, Shanika Kurukulasuriya, Betty Chow-Lockerbie, Thushari Gunawardana, Kalhari Goonewardene, Ruwani Karunarathna, Lisanework E Ayalew, Khawaja Ashfaque Ahmed, Suresh K Tikoo, Philip Willson, Susantha Gomis
JournalVaccine (Vaccine) Vol. 36 Issue 5 Pg. 744-750 (01 29 2018) ISSN: 1873-2518 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID29292175 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Antibodies, Neutralizing
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Vaccines, Inactivated
  • Viral Vaccines
Topics
  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Neutralizing (immunology)
  • Antibodies, Viral (immunology)
  • Chickens
  • Cross Reactions
  • Hepatitis, Viral, Animal (immunology, mortality, prevention & control, virology)
  • Immunity, Maternally-Acquired
  • Immunization
  • Poultry Diseases (immunology, mortality, prevention & control, virology)
  • Vaccines, Inactivated (administration & dosage, adverse effects, immunology)
  • Viral Vaccines (administration & dosage, adverse effects, immunology)
  • Virus Shedding

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: