HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Videourodynamic factors predictive of successful onabotulinumtoxinA urethral sphincter injection for neurogenic or non-neurogenic detrusor underactivity.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
The aim of the present study was to analyze treatment outcomes and identify videourodynamic factors predictive of successful urethral onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of neurogenic and non-neurogenic detrusor underactivity (DU).
METHODS:
Patients with DU refractory to medical treatment were treated with injections totaling 100 U onabotulinumtoxinA into the urethral sphincter. Treatment outcomes were assessed 1 month after treatment using the Global Response Assessment. The videourodynamic parameters evaluated included bladder neck status during voiding, bladder sensation, detrusor pressure, maximum flow rate, and post-void residual volume. Treatment outcome was analyzed by patient and baseline videourodynamic characteristics.
RESULTS:
In all, 60 patients (27 with non-neurogenic and 33 with neurogenic DU) were included in the study and received urethral sphincter injections of 100 U onabotulinumtoxinA in total. Good outcomes were reported in 36 (60%) patients (20 [74.1%] with non-neurogenic and 16 [48.5%] with neurogenic DU). Treatment outcome was significantly better in patients with non-neurogenic than neurogenic DU (P = .039). However, good treatment outcome was not related to age, gender, or any videourodynamic variables, except for an open bladder neck during voiding vs non-opening bladder neck (94.3% vs. 12.0%; P < .0001). The duration of the therapeutic effect was similar between patients with non-neurogenic and neurogenic DU (mean [± SD] 7.37 ± 3.69 vs. 7.69 ± 3.18 months, respectively; P = .788). In all, 12 patients reported de novo urinary incontinence after urethral onabotulinumtoxinA injection, 4 of whom developed stress urinary incontinence and 8 who had exacerbated urgency urinary incontinence.
CONCLUSION:
Urethral sphincter injection of onabotulinumtoxinA is effective in 60% of patients with DU. Careful videourodynamic interpretation of bladder neck opening enables urologists to select appropriate candidates for onabotulinumtoxinA treatment.
AuthorsYuan-Hong Jiang, Jia-Fong Jhang, Sheng-Fu Chen, Hann-Chorng Kuo
JournalLower urinary tract symptoms (Low Urin Tract Symptoms) Vol. 11 Issue 1 Pg. 66-71 (Jan 2019) ISSN: 1757-5672 [Electronic] Australia
PMID29024564 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Chemical References
  • Urological Agents
  • Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Topics
  • Aged
  • Botulinum Toxins, Type A (administration & dosage)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Injections
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Off-Label Use
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urethra
  • Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic (complications, drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Urinary Bladder, Underactive (complications, drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Urinary Retention (drug therapy, etiology, physiopathology)
  • Urodynamics (physiology)
  • Urological Agents (administration & dosage)
  • Video Recording

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: