HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Neoadjuvant luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate improves prostate-specific antigen-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) remains to be established. We previously reported favorable biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in high-risk Pca patients treated with a neoadjuvant therapy comprising a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus low dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) (LHRH+EMP) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). In the present study, we used a retrospective design via propensity score matching to elucidate the clinical benefit of neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP for high-risk Pca.
METHODS:
The Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database contained data for 1,268 consecutive Pca patients treated with RP alone at 4 institutions between April 2000 and March 2011 (RP alone group). In the RP alone group, we identified 386 high-risk Pca patients. The neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP group included 274 patients with high-risk Pca treated between September 2005 and November 2013 at Hirosaki University. Neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy included LHRH and EMP administration at a dose of 280 mg/day for 6 months before RP. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and BRFS.
RESULTS:
The propensity score-matched analysis indicated 210 matched pairs from both groups. The 5-year BRFS rates were 90.4 and 65.8 % for the neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP and RP alone groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The 5-year OS rates were 100 and 96.1 % for the neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP and RP alone groups, respectively (P = 0.110).
CONCLUSIONS:
Although the present study was not randomized, neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy followed by RP appeared to reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence. A prospective randomized study is warranted to determine the clinical implications of the neoadjuvant therapy described here.
AuthorsTakuya Koie, Koji Mitsuzuka, Takahiro Yoneyama, Shintaro Narita, Sadafumi Kawamura, Yasuhiro Kaiho, Norihiko Tsuchiya, Tatsuo Tochigi, Tomonori Habuchi, Yoichi Arai, Chikara Ohyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Yuki Tobisawa
JournalInternational journal of clinical oncology (Int J Clin Oncol) Vol. 20 Issue 5 Pg. 1018-25 (Oct 2015) ISSN: 1437-7772 [Electronic] Japan
PMID25681879 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
  • Goserelin
  • Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
  • Estramustine
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Leuprolide
Topics
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal (administration & dosage)
  • Estramustine (administration & dosage)
  • Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (agonists)
  • Goserelin (administration & dosage)
  • Humans
  • Leuprolide (administration & dosage)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Propensity Score
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen (blood)
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic Neoplasms (blood, drug therapy, surgery)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: