Abstract |
This study tests the proposal that hypnotic responding is effortless. The authors compared the responses of high and low hypnotizable participants (N = 70) in and out of hypnosis on a dual-task paradigm in which they were required to maintain hypnotic blindness during presentation of visual stimuli of varying salience intensities while simultaneously completing a secondary task. Whereas high hypnotizable participants in both hypnosis and wake conditions reported comparable levels of conviction in the hallucination suggestion, hypnotized highs performed poorer on the secondary task when the stimulus was present. Performance on the secondary task deteriorated when the visual stimulus was intensified. These findings contradict the notion that hypnotic response is not demanding on cognitive resources and suggest that increased effort is required to resolve the extent of conflict between reality and suggestion.
|
Authors | Miriam Wyzenbeek, Richard A Bryant |
Journal | The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis
(Int J Clin Exp Hypn)
Vol. 60
Issue 1
Pg. 67-80
( 2012)
ISSN: 1744-5183 [Electronic] England |
PMID | 22098570
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Acoustic Stimulation
- Adolescent
- Cognition
- Female
- Hallucinations
(psychology)
- Humans
- Hypnosis
- Male
- Photic Stimulation
- Reaction Time
- Suggestion
- Task Performance and Analysis
|