HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A novel approach to quality improvement in a safety-net practice: concurrent peer review visits.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
Concurrent peer review visits are structured office visits conducted by clinician peers of the primary care clinician that are specifically designed to reduce competing demands, clinical inertia, and bias. We assessed whether a single concurrent peer review visit reduced clinical inertia and improved control of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes control among underserved patients.
METHODS:
We conducted a randomized encouragement trial to evaluate concurrent peer review visits with a community health center. Seven hundred twenty-seven patients with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and/or diabetes who were not at goal for systolic blood pressure (SBP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and/or glycated hemoglobin (A1c) were randomly assigned to an invitation to participate in a concurrent peer review visit or to usual care. We compared change in these measures using mixed models and rates of therapeutic intensification during concurrent peer review visits with control visits.
RESULTS:
One hundred seventy-one patients completed a concurrent peer review visit. SBP improved significantly (p < .01) more among those completing concurrent peer review visits than among those who failed to respond to a concurrent peer review invitation or those randomized to usual care. There were no differences seen for changes in LDL-C or A1c. Concurrent peer review visits were associated with statistically significant greater clinician intensification of blood pressure (p < .001), lipid (p < .001), and diabetes (p < .005) treatment than either for control visits for patients in either the nonresponse group or usual care group.
CONCLUSIONS:
Concurrent peer review visits represent a promising strategy for improving blood pressure control and improving therapeutic intensification in community health centers.
AuthorsKevin Fiscella, Ellen Volpe, Paul Winters, Melissa Brown, Amna Idris, Tricia Harren
JournalJournal of the National Medical Association (J Natl Med Assoc) Vol. 102 Issue 12 Pg. 1231-6 (Dec 2010) ISSN: 0027-9684 [Print] United States
PMID21287904 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Community Health Centers (standards)
  • Diabetes Mellitus (therapy)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hyperlipidemias (therapy)
  • Hypertension (therapy)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • New York
  • Peer Review
  • Primary Health Care (standards)
  • Quality Improvement
  • Registries

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: