HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Myocardial protection in heart transplantation using blood cardioplegia: 12-year outcome of a prospective randomized trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Blood cardioplegia yields a lower prevalence of right heart failure, arrhythmias, and myocardial ischemia early after heart transplantation (HTx). Because depolarizing (high [K(+)]) cardioplegic solutions may alledgedly cause endothelial damage, the 12-year outcome of a prospective randomized trial was reviewed.
METHODS:
Between January 1997 and March 1998, 47 consecutive patients received crystalloid (Group 1, n = 27) or blood cardioplegia (Group 2, n = 20). The groups were similarly matched: recipient age (54 ± 11 vs 55 ± 7 years, p = 0.9), sex (89% vs 90% males, p = 0.9), diagnosis (63% vs 65% dilated cardiomyopathy, p = 0.8), elevated (>4 WU) pulmonary vascular resistance (30% vs 30%, p = 0.9), prior operations (22% vs 30%, p = 0.5), urgent HTx (7% vs 20%, p = 0.2), donor age (32 ± 11 vs 31 ± 13 years, p = 0.7), donor sex (78% vs 70% males, p = 0.5), donor cause of death (33% vs 40% vascular, p = 0.5), and global myocardial ischemia (176 ± 51 vs 180 ± 58 minutes p = 0.5). Hemodynamically unstable donors were more prevalent in Group 2 (15% vs 45%, p = 0.02). The 45 hospital survivors underwent yearly echocardiography, coronary angiography, and coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging during follow-up.
RESULTS:
During follow-up (10.4 ± 5.2, range, 0.9-12.7 years), Groups 1 and 2 had comparable mortality (46% vs 42%, p = 0.7) and cause of death (chronic rejection: 50% vs 50%; neoplasia: 33% vs 25%, p = 0.8). Survival at 12 years was 50% ± 12% vs 52% ± 11% (p = 0.9). Follow-up echocardiogram showed similar mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 47% ± 12% vs 49% ± 11%, p = 0.7) and prevalence of LVEF < 35% (21% vs 18%, p = 0.8). Prevalence of chronic rejection was comparable (42% vs 32%, p = 0.1), yet severe allograft vasculopathy (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation cardiac allograft vasculopathy 3) was more prevalent in Group 1 (64% vs 17%, p = 0.04). Freedom from chronic rejection was higher in Group 2 (44% ± 15% vs 63% ± 13%), albeit not significantly (p = 0.5). A trend toward greater prevalence of intimal disease at IVUS (thickness > 0.5 mm) in the proximal and distal left anterior descending artery (67% vs 40%; 58% vs 45%) and higher number of percutaneous coronary interventions (2.7 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 0.3, p = 0.3) was noted in Group 1.
CONCLUSIONS:
Use of blood cardioplegia is safe and results in comparable survival and prevalence of adverse events late after HTx. The trend towards greater freedom from chronic rejection and more limited extent of coronary artery disease in grafts protected with blood cardioplegia awaits confirmation.
AuthorsGiovanni Battista Luciani, Alberto Forni, Gianluca Rigatelli, Bartolomeo Chiominto, Paolo Cardaioli, Alessandro Mazzucco, Giuseppe Faggian
JournalThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation (J Heart Lung Transplant) Vol. 30 Issue 1 Pg. 29-36 (Jan 2011) ISSN: 1557-3117 [Electronic] United States
PMID20888255 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2011 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Cardioplegic Solutions
  • Crystalloid Solutions
  • Isotonic Solutions
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cardiomyopathy, Dilated (surgery)
  • Cardioplegic Solutions (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Crystalloid Solutions
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Transplantation (methods, mortality)
  • Humans
  • Isotonic Solutions (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Reperfusion Injury (prevention & control)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: