HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Patch testing to a standard screening series of allergens in combination with supplemental cosmetic allergens is often used to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis due to personal care products.
OBJECTIVE:
To report results of patch testing to skin care product allergens contained in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series and to compare efficacy of this combined series in detecting positive reactions to personal care product allergens with the efficacy of various standard screening series.
METHODS:
Positive reaction rates to skin care product allergens were tabulated for patients who underwent patch testing to both standard and cosmetic series allergens at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2007. Data were compared with skin care allergens detected on standard screening series, including the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) test.
RESULTS:
Of 945 patch-tested patients, 68.4% had at least one positive reaction and 47.3% had at least two positive reactions. Also, 49.4% of patients reacted to at least one preservative; 31.2% reacted to at least one fragrance/botanical additive. Compared with use of our standard series and cosmetic series, use of the TRUE test would have missed 22.5% of patients with preservative allergy, 11.3% with fragrance/botanical allergy, and 17.3% with vehicle allergy.
LIMITATIONS:
Various allergens tested over time, patch test reading by residents, and lack of confirmation of allergen in personal care products.
CONCLUSION:
Standard patch-test screening series miss a substantial number of patients with skin care product ingredient allergy.
AuthorsDavid A Wetter, James A Yiannias, Amy V Prakash, Mark D P Davis, Sara A Farmer, Rokea A el-Azhary
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology (J Am Acad Dermatol) Vol. 63 Issue 5 Pg. 789-98 (Nov 2010) ISSN: 1097-6787 [Electronic] United States
PMID20643495 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Validation Study)
CopyrightCopyright © 2009 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Allergens
  • Cosmetics
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Allergens (adverse effects)
  • Cosmetics (adverse effects)
  • Databases, Factual (statistics & numerical data)
  • Dermatitis, Allergic Contact (diagnosis)
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening (methods, standards)
  • Middle Aged
  • Minnesota
  • Patch Tests (methods, standards)
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Skin Care (adverse effects)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: