Abstract | BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVE: To report results of patch testing to skin care product allergens contained in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series and to compare efficacy of this combined series in detecting positive reactions to personal care product allergens with the efficacy of various standard screening series. METHODS: Positive reaction rates to skin care product allergens were tabulated for patients who underwent patch testing to both standard and cosmetic series allergens at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2007. Data were compared with skin care allergens detected on standard screening series, including the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) test. RESULTS: Of 945 patch-tested patients, 68.4% had at least one positive reaction and 47.3% had at least two positive reactions. Also, 49.4% of patients reacted to at least one preservative; 31.2% reacted to at least one fragrance/botanical additive. Compared with use of our standard series and cosmetic series, use of the TRUE test would have missed 22.5% of patients with preservative allergy, 11.3% with fragrance/botanical allergy, and 17.3% with vehicle allergy. LIMITATIONS: CONCLUSION: Standard patch-test screening series miss a substantial number of patients with skin care product ingredient allergy.
|
Authors | David A Wetter, James A Yiannias, Amy V Prakash, Mark D P Davis, Sara A Farmer, Rokea A el-Azhary |
Journal | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
(J Am Acad Dermatol)
Vol. 63
Issue 5
Pg. 789-98
(Nov 2010)
ISSN: 1097-6787 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 20643495
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Validation Study)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2009 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Allergens
(adverse effects)
- Cosmetics
(adverse effects)
- Databases, Factual
(statistics & numerical data)
- Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
(diagnosis)
- False Negative Reactions
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Mass Screening
(methods, standards)
- Middle Aged
- Minnesota
- Patch Tests
(methods, standards)
- Reproducibility of Results
- Skin Care
(adverse effects)
- Young Adult
|