HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
Adequate patient sedation is mandatory for diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In this respect it is known that the short-acting anesthetic propofol offers certain potential advantages for sedation during ERCP, but there are no controlled studies concerning the feasibility and safety of propofol sedation in elderly, high-risk patients.
METHODS:
One hundred and fifty consecutive patients aged >or=80 yr with high comorbidity (ASA score >or=III: 91 %), randomly received midazolam plus meperidine (n = 75) or propofol alone (n = 75) for sedation during ERCP. Vital signs were continuously monitored and procedure-related parameters, recovery time, and quality as well as patients' cooperation and tolerance of the procedure were assessed.
RESULTS:
Clinically relevant changes in vital signs were observed at comparable frequencies with a temporary oxygen desaturation (<90%) occurring in eight patients in the propofol-group and seven patients receiving midazolam/meperidine (n.s.). Hypotension was documented in two patients in the propofol group and one patient receiving midazolam/meperidine. Propofol provided a significantly better patient cooperation than midazolam/meperidine (p < 0.01), but the procedure tolerability was rated nearly the same by both groups. Mean recovery time was significantly shorter in the propofol group (22 +/- 7 min vs 31 +/- 8 min for midazolam/meperidine (p < 0.01)) while the recovery score was significantly higher under propofol (8.3 +/- 1.2 vs 6.1 +/- 1.1(p < 0.01)). During recovery a significant lower number of desaturation events (<90%) were observed in the propofol group (12%) than in the midazolam/meperidine group (26%, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION:
Under careful monitoring the use of propofol for sedation during ERCP is superior to midazolam/meperidine even in high-risk octogenarians.
AuthorsAndrea Riphaus, Nikos Stergiou, Till Wehrmann
JournalThe American journal of gastroenterology (Am J Gastroenterol) Vol. 100 Issue 9 Pg. 1957-63 (Sep 2005) ISSN: 0002-9270 [Print] United States
PMID16128939 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Meperidine
  • Midazolam
  • Propofol
Topics
  • Aged
  • Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
  • Comorbidity
  • Conscious Sedation (methods)
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives (adverse effects)
  • Hypotension (chemically induced)
  • Male
  • Meperidine (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Midazolam (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Monitoring, Physiologic
  • Propofol (adverse effects)
  • Risk Factors
  • Safety
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: