HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Body build and risk of cardiovascular events in hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE (Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension) study.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Obesity may independently increase the risk of adverse events in hypertension with target-organ damage. We investigated whether body build was independently associated with higher cardiovascular risk and whether treatment with losartan relative to atenolol influenced the impact of body build on the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, stroke, and myocardial infarction and on cardiovascular death in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study.
METHODS AND RESULTS:
The population of 9079 patients was divided as follows: thin (body mass index [BMI] <20 kg/m2, 2%), normal weight (BMI 20 to 24.9, 24%), overweight (BMI 25 to 29.9, 45%), and obese (class I: BMI 30 to 34.9, 21%; class II: BMI 35 to 39.9, 6%; class III: BMI > or =40, 2%). Incident diabetes increased progressively with BMI and was somewhat higher in the atenolol arm. Differences in gender and race were detected among the body build groups. Rates (Cox proportional hazard analysis) of the primary composite end point did not differ among body build groups after adjustment for age, gender, race, smoking habit, prevalent cardiovascular disease, and left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiovascular death was more frequent among thin (P<0.05) and pooled class II-III obesity (both P<0.04) than normal-weight groups. Risk was not attenuated significantly by losartan treatment, nor did it interfere with the greater benefit of losartan- as opposed to atenolol-based treatment.
CONCLUSIONS:
In the LIFE study, stratification for classes of body build identified increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in both thin and moderately-to-severely obese individuals. This risk was not attenuated significantly by losartan treatment, nor did it interfere with the greater benefit of losartan-based treatment as opposed to atenolol-based treatment.
AuthorsGiovanni de Simone, Kristian Wachtell, Vittorio Palmieri, Darcy A Hille, Gareth Beevers, Björn Dahlöf, Ulf de Faire, Frej Fyhrquist, Hans Ibsen, Stevo Julius, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Ole Lederballe-Pedersen, Lars H Lindholm, Markku S Nieminen, Per Omvik, Suzanne Oparil, Richard B Devereux
JournalCirculation (Circulation) Vol. 111 Issue 15 Pg. 1924-31 (Apr 19 2005) ISSN: 1524-4539 [Electronic] United States
PMID15837945 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Atenolol
  • Losartan
Topics
  • Aged
  • Atenolol (therapeutic use)
  • Body Mass Index
  • Body Weight
  • Cardiovascular Diseases (drug therapy, etiology, physiopathology)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertension (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Losartan (therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Obesity
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Risk Assessment
  • Somatotypes (physiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: