Abstract | OBJECTIVES: METHODS: A meta-analysis of all relevant studies was performed to determine whether hemodialyzer reuse was associated with an increased relative risk of mortality or hospitalization. A decision tree was constructed to model the effect of three different dialysis strategies (single-use dialysis, heated citric acid, and formaldehyde dialyzer reuse) on the costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy of "typical" hemodialysis patients. The cost of heated citric acid reuse was estimated from a center experienced with the technique. The cost of end-stage renal disease ( ESRD) care, survival data, and patient utilities were estimated from published sources. RESULTS: There was evidence of a higher relative risk of hospitalization (but not mortality) for hemodialyzer reuse compared with single-use dialysis. Depending on the assumptions used, the cost savings that could be expected by switching from single-use dialysis to heated citric acid reuse were small, ranging from CAN $0-739 per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS:
ESRD programs can incorporate the results of this study based on their individual situations to determine whether hemodialyzer reuse is appropriate in their setting.
|
Authors | Braden J Manns, Ken Taub, Robert M A Richardson, Cam Donaldson |
Journal | International journal of technology assessment in health care
(Int J Technol Assess Health Care)
Vol. 18
Issue 1
Pg. 81-93
( 2002)
ISSN: 0266-4623 [Print] England |
PMID | 11987444
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Canada
(epidemiology)
- Citric Acid
- Decision Support Techniques
- Equipment Reuse
(economics)
- Female
- Formaldehyde
- Health Care Costs
- Health Care Rationing
- Hospitalization
- Humans
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
(economics, mortality, therapy)
- Male
- Quality of Life
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Renal Dialysis
(economics, instrumentation)
- Risk Factors
- Sterilization
(methods)
- Technology Assessment, Biomedical
|