Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: According to the InSync registry, we predefined possible indications for BIV as follows: complete branch bundle block (> 120 ms), left-ventricular ejection fraction (EF) < 35 % and NYHA class > II. We evaluated the number of patients presenting this indication at time of implant and during follow-up (FU) at our ICD clinic. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 1998, 360 patients were provided with an ICD (mean age 64.6 +/- 5.4 yrs, mean EF 37 +/- 14 % at implant, 82 % of patients with organic heart disease). Mean FU was 34 +/- 21 months. During FU 46 patients (13 %) died, 15 of these (33 %) presenting criteria for BIV. 33 patients died of heart failure, there was 1 sudden death and 12 patients died for non-cardiac reasons. 35 % of the patients who died of heart failure had an indication for BIV. CONCLUSIONS: About 10 % of ICD patients had an indication for BIV at time of implant. Over a mean FU period of 34 months, 16% of all patients presented an indication for BIV. Patients with an indication for BIV had a higher mortality rate and more frequent atrial fibrillation compared to patients without. With this data and the good clinical results after BIV-ICD implantation, we consider the implantation of a BIV-ICD system in every patient with appropriate indications.
|
Authors | C Werling, U Weisse, G Siemon, A-H Kiessling, M Rameken, H Schwacke, W Saggau, J Senges, K Seidl |
Journal | The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon
(Thorac Cardiovasc Surg)
Vol. 50
Issue 2
Pg. 67-70
(Apr 2002)
ISSN: 0171-6425 [Print] Germany |
PMID | 11981703
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac
(therapy)
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
(methods)
- Death, Sudden, Cardiac
(prevention & control)
- Defibrillators, Implantable
- Female
- Heart Failure
(prevention & control, therapy)
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Patient Selection
- Retrospective Studies
- Treatment Outcome
|