HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Prognostic Utility of Stress Testing and Cardiac Biomarkers in Menopausal Women at Low to Intermediate Risk for Coronary ARTery Disease (SMART Study): 5-Year Outcome.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
In women with low to intermediate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), prognostic detection strategies have been controversial. We present the follow-up data of the SMART trial in peri/postmenopausal women at low to intermediate risk of CAD.
OBJECTIVES:
To determine the value of contrast stress echocardiography (CSE), stress electrocardiogram (sECG), and serum biomarkers for prediction of cardiovascular events (CE) in peri/postmenopausal women at low to intermediate risk of CAD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
From January 2004 to August 2007, 400 peri/postmenopausal women were prospectively enrolled. All women had detailed risk factor assessment, and underwent simultaneous CSE (Definity®, Lantheus Medical Imaging) and sECG. Laboratories included brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), atrial natriuretic peptide, endothelin, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein. Wall motion score index was based on a 16-segment model. Abnormal CSE was defined as new or worsening wall motion abnormality at stress, while abnormal sECG was ≥1 mm horizontal/downsloping ST segment depression/elevation (80 mseconds duration). Self-reported outcome data were collected from a mailed Women's Heart Clinic Questionnaire. CE outcomes included all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, chest pain hospitalization or development of typical angina (CP), and revascularization (REVASC). Adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR; 95% confidence intervals) were reported.
RESULTS:
A total of 366 women (54.4 ± 5.5 years, Framingham risk 6.5% ± 4.4%) completed simultaneous CSE and sECG. Forty-two (11.5%) had abnormal CSE, while sECG was abnormal in 22 (6%) women. Follow-up (4.4 ± 1.2 years) was available in 315/366 (86%) women (78% exercise-CSE, 22% dobutamine-CSE). In those who completed follow-up, CSE was abnormal in 33 women (10.5%) and sECG was abnormal in 21 (6.7%). In 33 women with abnormal CSE, sECG was abnormal in 7 (21.2%) and normal in 26 (79%), p = 0.0004. CE occurred in 27 (8.6%) women: 8 all-cause mortality, 2 nonfatal MI, 13 CP, and 4 REVASC. CE occurred in 21% versus 7% of women with abnormal versus normal CSE, p = 0.014 and 38% versus 6% of women with abnormal versus normal sECG, p < 0.0001. Rest BNP was higher in women with CE versus those without (p = 0.018). Abnormal sECG and abnormal CSE were associated with CE, while only abnormal sECG was an independent predictor of CE (adjusted HR 10.3 [1.9-61.4], p = 0.007). Of the laboratory results, only BNP was associated with CE (adjusted HR 2.9 [1.1-7.3], p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS:
sECG and rest BNP were independent predictors of subsequent CE within 5 years in peri/postmenopausal women at low to intermediate risk of CAD.
AuthorsSahar S Abdelmoneim, Caroline A Ball, Francesca Mantovani, Mary E Hagen, Susan Eifert-Rain, Susan Wilansky, Ramon Castello, Patricia A Pellikka, Patricia J M Best, Sharon L Mulvagh
JournalJournal of women's health (2002) (J Womens Health (Larchmt)) Vol. 27 Issue 5 Pg. 542-551 (05 2018) ISSN: 1931-843X [Electronic] United States
PMID29672210 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Biomarkers
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Angina Pectoris (epidemiology)
  • Arizona (epidemiology)
  • Biomarkers (blood)
  • Body Mass Index
  • Chest Pain (etiology)
  • Coronary Artery Disease (diagnostic imaging)
  • Echocardiography, Stress (methods, statistics & numerical data)
  • Electrocardiography
  • Exercise Test
  • Female
  • Florida (epidemiology)
  • Heart Failure (epidemiology)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Menopause
  • Middle Aged
  • Minnesota (epidemiology)
  • Myocardial Infarction (epidemiology)
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: