HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy of commercially available vaccines against canine leptospirosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Leptospirosis is a worldwide distributed zoonosis that affects most mammal species, including dogs and humans. Vaccination is the main strategy to control disease and urinary shedding of leptospires in dogs; however, there are few studies in the literature reporting the efficacy of commercially available vaccines.
OBJECTIVES:
To access and compare the efficacy of commercially available leptospiral vaccines dogs using a quali-quantitative systematic review.
METHODS:
The main outcome of interest was the ability to protect dogs against clinical disease and renal carrier state, as well as promoting duration of immunity. Experimental and observational study designs were eligible for inclusion, and methodology was validated by PROSPERO, under registration CRD42020178194. Five electronic databases were searched. Data about population, methodology and outcomes were extracted in a dichotomous or continuous manner. Evaluation of risk of bias for individual studies was assessed using SYRCLE tool.
RESULTS:
Thirteen challenge trials and eight observational studies were included, comprising 12 vaccine brands. In the calculated pooled effect, vaccinated dogs had a reduced Relative Risk of developing clinical disease (0.16) and renal carrier state (0.12) when compared to unvaccinated controls. The heterogeneity between studies was low; however, methodologies and different parameters were used in the studies to define the outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE:
Our study has demonstrated that commercially available vaccines against leptospirosis can provide an overall 84% protection against clinical disease and 88% against renal carrier status. Protection against clinical disease and carrier status by serovars Canicola, Australis and Grippotyphosa is inconsistent for some vaccine brands, and such hurdle is mostly attributed to methodological difficulties in inducing experimental infection using these serovars. Evidence shows that immunity provided by the vaccines included in our meta-analysis can persist for at least one year under experimental conditions. However, the duration of MAT titers induced by vaccination do not correlate with protection.
AuthorsStephanie Bergmann Esteves, Cassia Moreira Santos, Fabiana Ferreira Salgado, Amane Paldês Gonçales, Aline Gil Alves Guilloux, Camila Marinelli Martins, Mitika Kuribaiashi Hagiwara, Bruno Alonso Miotto
JournalVaccine (Vaccine) Vol. 40 Issue 12 Pg. 1722-1740 (03 15 2022) ISSN: 1873-2518 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID35153090 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review)
CopyrightCopyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Antibodies, Bacterial
  • Bacterial Vaccines
Topics
  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Bacterial
  • Bacterial Vaccines
  • Dog Diseases (epidemiology)
  • Dogs
  • Leptospira
  • Leptospirosis (epidemiology, prevention & control, veterinary)
  • Observational Studies as Topic
  • Zoonoses

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: