HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Pathologic Examination of Pancreatic Specimens Resected for Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Recommendations From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society.

Abstract
Currently, there are no internationally accepted consensus guidelines for pathologic evaluation of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens. The Neoadjuvant Therapy Working Group of Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society was formed in 2018 to review grossing protocols, literature, and major issues and to develop recommendations for pathologic evaluation of posttherapy pancreatectomy specimens. The working group generated the following recommendations: (1) Systematic and standardized grossing and sampling protocols should be adopted for pancreatectomy specimens for treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). (2) Consecutive mapping sections along the largest gross tumor dimension are recommended to validate tumor size by histology as required by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) cancer protocol. (3) Tumor size of treated PDACs should be measured microscopically as the largest dimension of tumor outer limits that is bound by viable tumor cells, including intervening stroma. (4) The MD Anderson grading system for tumor response has a better correlation with prognosis and better interobserver concordance among pathologists than does the CAP system. (5) A case should not be classified as a complete response unless the entire pancreas, peripancreatic tissues, ampulla of Vater, common bile duct, and duodenum adjacent to the pancreas are submitted for microscopic examination. (6) Future studies on tumor response of lymph node metastases, molecular and/or immunohistochemical markers, as well as application of artificial intelligence in grading tumor response of treated PDAC are needed. In summary, systematic, standardized pathologic evaluation, accurate tumor size measurement, and reproducible tumor response grading to neoadjuvant therapy are needed for optimal patient care. The criteria and discussions provided here may provide guidance towards these goals.
AuthorsHuamin Wang, Runjan Chetty, Mojgan Hosseini, Daniela S Allende, Irene Esposito, Yoko Matsuda, Vikram Deshpande, Jiaqi Shi, Deepti Dhall, Kee-Taek Jang, Grace E Kim, Claudio Luchini, Rondell P Graham, Michelle D Reid, Olca Basturk, Ralph H Hruban, Alyssa Krasinskas, David S Klimstra, Volkan Adsay, Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society
JournalThe American journal of surgical pathology (Am J Surg Pathol) Vol. 46 Issue 6 Pg. 754-764 (06 01 2022) ISSN: 1532-0979 [Electronic] United States
PMID34889852 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
CopyrightCopyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal (pathology, surgery)
  • Humans
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Pancreatectomy
  • Pancreatic Ducts (pathology)
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms (pathology, surgery)
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: