HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of a Hemostatic Powder and Standard Treatment in the Control of Active Bleeding From Upper Nonvariceal Lesions : A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The effectiveness of the hemostatic powder TC-325 as a single endoscopic treatment for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare TC-325 with standard endoscopic hemostatic treatments in the control of active bleeding from nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal causes.
DESIGN:
One-sided, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02534571).
SETTING:
University teaching hospitals in the Asia-Pacific region.
PATIENTS:
224 adult patients with acute bleeding from a nonvariceal cause on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
INTERVENTION:
TC-325 (n = 111) or standard hemostatic treatment (n = 113).
MEASUREMENTS:
The primary outcome was control of bleeding within 30 days. Other outcomes included failure to control bleeding during index endoscopy, recurrent bleeding after initial hemostasis, further interventions, blood transfusion, hospitalization, and death.
RESULTS:
224 patients were enrolled (136 with gastroduodenal ulcers [60.7%], 33 with tumors [14.7%], and 55 with other causes of bleeding [24.6%]). Bleeding was controlled within 30 days in 100 of 111 patients (90.1%) in the TC-325 group and 92 of 113 (81.4%) in the standard treatment group (risk difference, 8.7 percentage points [1-sided 95% CI, 0.95 percentage point]). There were fewer failures of hemostasis during index endoscopy with TC-325 (3 [2.7%] vs. 11 [9.7%]; odds ratio, 0.26 [CI, 0.07 to 0.95]). Recurrent bleeding within 30 days did not differ between groups (9 [8.1%] vs. 10 [8.8%]). The need for further interventions also did not differ between groups (further endoscopic treatment: 8 [7.2%] vs. 10 [8.8%]; angiography: 2 [1.8%] vs. 4 [3.5%]; surgery: 1 [0.9%] vs. 0). There were 14 deaths in each group (12.6% vs. 12.4%).
LIMITATION:
Clinicians were not blinded to treatment.
CONCLUSION:
TC-325 is not inferior to standard treatment in the endoscopic control of bleeding from nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal causes.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE:
General Research Fund to the University Grants Committee, Hong Kong SAR Government.
AuthorsJames Y W Lau, Rapat Pittayanon, Andrew Kwek, Raymond S Tang, Heyson Chan, Rungsun Rerknimitr, June Lee, Tiing Leong Ang, Bing-Yee Suen, Yuan-Yuan Yu, Francis K L Chan, Joseph J Y Sung
JournalAnnals of internal medicine (Ann Intern Med) Vol. 175 Issue 2 Pg. 171-178 (Feb 2022) ISSN: 1539-3704 [Electronic] United States
PMID34871051 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Hemostatics
  • Powders
Topics
  • Adult
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (etiology, therapy)
  • Hemostasis, Endoscopic (adverse effects)
  • Hemostatics (therapeutic use)
  • Hong Kong
  • Humans
  • Powders
  • Recurrence

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: