HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Iodized oil computed tomography versus ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the standard of care for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the clinical outcomes of iodized oil computed tomography (IoCT) versus ultrasound (US)-guided RFA for HCC remain unclear.
METHODS:
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive treatment-naïve patients who received curative RFA for HCC within Milan criteria from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients who underwent either IoCT-guided RFA (IoCT group) or US-guided RFA (US group) were included. Various clinical factors, including tumor location, were adjusted with a 1:1 propensity score matching. Subsequently, the cumulative incidence rates for recurrence and hazard ratios for survival were calculated.
RESULTS:
We included 184 (37.9%) and 301 (62.1%) patients who received IoCT- and US-guided RFA, respectively. Before propensity score matching, IoCT guidance was significantly associated with multiple tumors, higher body mass index, lower albumin level, and tumors located at S8. After matching, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year local tumor progression rates of the IoCT group were significantly lower than those of the US group (4.4%, 6.9%, and 7.5% vs. 14.4%, 16.3%, and 16.3%, respectively, at p = 0.002, 0.009, and 0.016, respectively). In univariate analyses and multivariate analyses that adjusted for clinical and tumor location-related parameters, the IoCT group had better recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.581, 95% confidence interval 0.375-0.899) than those with US guidance but not overall survival.
CONCLUSION:
IoCT-guided RFA had a lower local tumor progression rate and better recurrence-free survival than did US-guided RFA for HCC within the Milan criteria. CT-guide RFA is a safe and effective alternative to US-guided with similar overall survival. IoCT-guided RFA might have a better local tumor control than US-guided. IoCT-guided RFA may be more suitable for male patients, aged < 70 years, a single tumor measuring 2-5 cm, and a tumor located at the subdiaphragmatic/subcardiac region.
AuthorsChih-Horng Wu, Po-Chin Liang, Tung-Hung Su, Ming-Chi Lin, Yu-Hsuan Chang, Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih, Jia-Horng Kao
JournalHepatology international (Hepatol Int) Vol. 15 Issue 5 Pg. 1247-1257 (Oct 2021) ISSN: 1936-0541 [Electronic] United States
PMID34338971 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© 2021. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.
Chemical References
  • Iodized Oil
Topics
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular (diagnostic imaging, surgery)
  • Catheter Ablation
  • Humans
  • Iodized Oil
  • Liver Neoplasms (diagnostic imaging, surgery)
  • Male
  • Radiofrequency Ablation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: