Clinical experience with
landiolol use in patients with
atrial fibrillation (AF) and a severely depressed left ventricular (LV) function is limited. We compared the efficacy and safety of
landiolol with that of
digoxin as an intravenous drug in controlling the heart rate (HR) during AF associated with a very low LV ejection fraction (LVEF).We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients treated with
landiolol (n = 34) or
digoxin (n = 19) for AF
tachycardias with an LVEF ≤ 25. The
landiolol dose was adjusted between 0.5 and 10 μg/kg/minute according to the patient's condition. The response to treatment was defined as a decrease in the HR of ≤ 110/minute, and that decreased by ≥ 20% from baseline.There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the clinical characteristics. The responder rate to
landiolol at 24 hours was significantly higher than that to
digoxin (71.0% versus 41.2%; odds ratio: 4.65, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-31.0, P = 0.048). The percent decrease in the HR from baseline at 1, 2, 12, and 24 hours was greater in the
landiolol group than in the
digoxin group (P < 0.01, P = 0.071, P = 0.036, and P = 0.016, respectively). The systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline within 24 hours after administering
landiolol was significantly reduced, whereas
digoxin did not decrease the SBP over time.
Hypotension (< 80 mmHg) occurred in two patients in the
landiolol group and 0 in the
digoxin group (P = 0.53).
Landiolol could be more effective in controlling the AF HR than
digoxin even in patients with severely depressed LV function. However, careful hemodynamic monitoring is necessary when administering
landiolol.