Our aim was to examine clinical trials, provide guidance to practitioners and estimate the efficacy and safety of two agents by comparing low dose
ticagrelor with standard dose
clopidogrel in patients with
acute coronary syndrome. We systematically looked through Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang data and CNKI for trials comparing low dose
ticagrelor with standard dose
clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with ACS since the database was created. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the rate of
major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary endpoint for safety was the rate of major
bleeding events. We also evaluated platelet function between low dose
ticagrelor and standard dose
clopidogrel in ACS patients. From 6744 articles, 16 studies including 1629 patients met the inclusion criteria. In contrast with standard dose
clopidogrel, low dose
ticagrelor significantly reduced MACEs (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26, 0.58) and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). No difference was noted for major
bleeding events (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.43, 3.08) between the two agents (p=0.77). In addition, low dose
ticagrelor showed lower platelet aggregation rate than
clopidogrel (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.68, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.53) (p<0.01). Platelet reaction units for low dose
ticagrelor were much lower than those for standard dose
clopidogrel (SMD -2.46, 95% CI -2.85 to -2.07) (p<0.01). In comparison with standard dose
clopidogrel, low dose
ticagrelor significantly lowered the incidence of MACEs, improved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left ventricular end diastolic dimension and did not expand the risk of major
bleeding events or minor or minimal
bleeding events in ACS patients with a considerable safety and efficacy profile. In addition, low dose
ticagrelor was associated with dramatically lower platelet aggregation compared with standard dose
clopidogrel.