This study analyzed 91
multiple myeloma patients who received two
monoclonal antibodies,
Daratumumab and
Elotuzumab, over a year and report the adverse event profile, infusion practices and utilization of these drugs in the real world. All current reported data on
monoclonal antibodies is from clinical trials, without any real-world experience. Patients from Mayo Clinic Florida or Arizona diagnosed with relapsed or refractory
multiple myeloma who were treated with
Daratumumab or
Elotuzumab alone or in combination between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 were included in the analysis.
Daratumumab-treated patients (n = 78) were more heavily pre-treated than that in published clinical trials, whereas the
elotuzumab patient (n = 13) profile was similar to that published before. Infusion time was on average 2 hours less than the prescribing guidelines and
premedication use varied noticeably after the initial
monoclonal antibody infusion, with an overall decrease over time. We noted higher than reported haematologic adverse events, especially
neutropenia and fewer non-haematologic adverse events. 91.7% infusion-related reactions were observed during the first
monoclonal antibody infusion, with a subsequent decrease. All infusion-related reactions were grade 2 or less, and none of the patients discontinued treatment due to infusion-related reactions. Baseline
allergy profile or laboratory tests were not associated with the likelihood of developing
monoclonal antibody-related infusion-related reactions. The real-world safety profile of
monoclonal antibodies showed varying adverse event patterns than those reported in previous clinical trials. The infusion-related reaction patterns were similar to previous reports. Despite changes in
premedication regimens safety was maintained in succeeding infusions. Such treatment utilization data is vital to broaden our knowledge of approved therapeutic agents and maximize their benefits for patients.