HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy for Nonspecific Intraventricular Conduction Delay Versus Right Bundle Branch Block.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) conduction abnormality have not been fully explored.
OBJECTIVES:
This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes among Medicare-aged patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD) versus right bundle branch block (RBBB) in patients eligible for implantation with a CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D).
METHODS:
Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) registry data between 2010 and 2013, the authors compared outcomes in CRT-eligible patients implanted with CRT-D versus ICD-only therapy among patients with NICD and RBBB. Also, among all CRT-D-implanted patients, the authors compared outcomes in those with NICD versus RBBB. Survival curves and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess outcomes including hospitalization and death.
RESULTS:
In 11,505 non-LBBB CRT-eligible patients, after multivariable adjustment, among patients with RBBB, CRT-D was not associated with better outcomes, compared with ICD alone, regardless of QRS duration. Among patients with NICD and a QRS ≥150 ms, CRT-D was associated with decreased mortality at 3 years compared with ICD alone (HR: 0.602; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.416 to 0.871; p = 0.0071). Among 5,954 CRT-D-implanted patients, after multivariable adjustment NICD compared with RBBB was associated with lower mortality at 3 years in those with a QRS duration of ≥150 ms (HR: 0.757; 95% CI: 0.625 to 0.917; p = 0.0044).
CONCLUSIONS:
Among non-LBBB CRT-D-eligible patients, CRT-D implantation was associated with better outcomes compared with ICD alone specifically in NICD patients with a QRS duration of ≥150 ms. Careful patient selection should be considered for CRT-D implantation in patients with non-LBBB conduction.
AuthorsHiro Kawata, Haikun Bao, Jeptha P Curtis, Karl E Minges, Teferi Mitiku, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, Gregory K Feld, Jonathan C Hsu
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology (J Am Coll Cardiol) Vol. 73 Issue 24 Pg. 3082-3099 (06 25 2019) ISSN: 1558-3597 [Electronic] United States
PMID31221257 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Aged
  • Bundle-Branch Block (diagnosis, epidemiology, physiopathology, therapy)
  • Cardiac Conduction System Disease (diagnosis, epidemiology, physiopathology, therapy)
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (adverse effects, methods, statistics & numerical data)
  • Defibrillators, Implantable (statistics & numerical data)
  • Electric Countershock (instrumentation, methods)
  • Electrocardiography (methods)
  • Female
  • Heart Ventricles (physiopathology)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medicare (statistics & numerical data)
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Patient Selection
  • Registries
  • United States (epidemiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: