HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

[11C]Erlotinib PET cannot detect acquired erlotinib resistance in NSCLC tumor xenografts in mice.

AbstractINTRODUCTION:
[11C]Erlotinib PET has shown promise to distinguish non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors harboring the activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation delE746-A750 from tumors with wild-type EGFR. To assess the suitability of [11C]erlotinib PET to detect the emergence of acquired erlotinib resistance in initially erlotinib-responsive tumors, we performed in vitro binding and PET experiments in mice bearing tumor xenografts using a range of different cancer cells, which were erlotinib-sensitive or exhibited clinically relevant resistance mechanisms to erlotinib.
METHODS:
The following cell lines were used for in vitro binding and PET experiments: the epidermoid carcinoma cell line A-431 (erlotinib-sensitive, wild-type EGFR) and the three NSCLC cell lines HCC827 (erlotinib-sensitive, delE746-A750), HCC827EPR (erlotinib-resistant, delE746-A750 and T790M) and HCC827ERLO (erlotinib-resistant, delE746-A750 and MET amplification). BALB/c nude mice with subcutaneous tumor xenografts underwent two consecutive [11C]erlotinib PET scans, a baseline scan and a second scan in which unlabeled erlotinib (10mg/kg) was co-injected. Logan graphical analysis was used to estimate total distribution volume (VT) of [11C]erlotinib in tumors.
RESULTS:
In vitro experiments revealed significantly higher uptake of [11C]erlotinib (5.2-fold) in the three NSCLC cell lines as compared to A-431 cells. In all four cell lines co-incubation with unlabeled erlotinib (1μM) led to significant reductions in [11C]erlotinib uptake (-19% to -66%). In both PET scans and for all four studied cell lines there were no significant differences in tumoral [11C]erlotinib VT values. For all three NSCLC cell lines, but not for the A-431 cell line, tumoral VT was significantly reduced following co-injection of unlabeled erlotinib (-20% to -35%).
CONCLUSIONS:
We found no significant differences in the in vitro and in vivo binding of [11C]erlotinib between erlotinib-sensitive and erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells. Our findings suggest that [11C]erlotinib PET will not be suitable to distinguish erlotinib-sensitive NSCLC tumors from tumors with acquired resistance to erlotinib.
AuthorsAlexander Traxl, Taraneh Beikbaghban, Thomas Wanek, Kushtrim Kryeziu, Christine Pirker, Severin Mairinger, Johann Stanek, Thomas Filip, Michael Sauberer, Claudia Kuntner, Walter Berger, Oliver Langer
JournalNuclear medicine and biology (Nucl Med Biol) Vol. 52 Pg. 7-15 (Sep 2017) ISSN: 1872-9614 [Electronic] United States
PMID28575795 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Erlotinib Hydrochloride
  • EGFR protein, human
  • ErbB Receptors
Topics
  • Animals
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung (diagnostic imaging, drug therapy, metabolism, pathology)
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cell Transformation, Neoplastic
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
  • ErbB Receptors (metabolism)
  • Erlotinib Hydrochloride (metabolism)
  • Female
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic (drug effects)
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms (diagnostic imaging, drug therapy, metabolism, pathology)
  • Mice
  • Positron-Emission Tomography

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: