Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: We prospectively stratified patients according to whether they elected to receive bevacizumab and then randomly assigned them to receive either paclitaxel, administered intravenously at a dose of 175 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks, plus carboplatin (dose equivalent to an area under the curve [AUC] of 6) for six cycles or paclitaxel, administered weekly at a dose of 80 mg per square meter, plus carboplatin (AUC, 6) for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 692 patients were enrolled, 84% of whom opted to receive bevacizumab. In the intention-to-treat analysis, weekly paclitaxel was not associated with longer progression-free survival than paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks (14.7 months and 14.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.06; P=0.18). Among patients who did not receive bevacizumab, weekly paclitaxel was associated with progression-free survival that was 3.9 months longer than that observed with paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks (14.2 vs. 10.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.95; P=0.03). However, among patients who received bevacizumab, weekly paclitaxel did not significantly prolong progression-free survival, as compared with paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks (14.9 months and 14.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.20; P=0.60). A test for interaction that assessed homogeneity of the treatment effect showed a significant difference between treatment with bevacizumab and without bevacizumab (P=0.047). Patients who received weekly paclitaxel had a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 anemia than did those who received paclitaxel every 3 weeks (36% vs. 16%), as well as a higher rate of grade 2 to 4 sensory neuropathy (26% vs. 18%); however, they had a lower rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (72% vs. 83%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, weekly paclitaxel, as compared with paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks, did not prolong progression-free survival among patients with ovarian cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Genentech; GOG-0262 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01167712.).
|
Authors | John K Chan, Mark F Brady, Richard T Penson, Helen Huang, Michael J Birrer, Joan L Walker, Paul A DiSilvestro, Stephen C Rubin, Lainie P Martin, Susan A Davidson, Warner K Huh, David M O'Malley, Matthew P Boente, Helen Michael, Bradley J Monk |
Journal | The New England journal of medicine
(N Engl J Med)
Vol. 374
Issue 8
Pg. 738-48
(Feb 25 2016)
ISSN: 1533-4406 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 26933849
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Bevacizumab
- Carboplatin
- Paclitaxel
|
Topics |
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Bevacizumab
(administration & dosage)
- Carboplatin
(administration & dosage)
- Disease-Free Survival
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Female
- Humans
- Infusions, Intravenous
- Intention to Treat Analysis
- Middle Aged
- Ovarian Neoplasms
(drug therapy)
- Paclitaxel
(administration & dosage)
|
|
Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!
Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease.
Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists
around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!
|