Abstract | BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes between minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) and conventional open liver resection (COLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a propensity-score matched analysis. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients who received MILR were matched with 198 patients treated with COLR out of 928 patients with HCC who received curative liver resection from 2002 to 2012. A multivariable logistic model based on factors related to the patient, tumor, and surgical procedure was used to estimate a propensity score. RESULTS: The MILR group experienced significantly less intraoperative blood loss (mean: 389.55 vs 580.66 mL; P = 0.008), lower complication rates (13.1% vs 24.7%; P = 0.020), and a shorter length of hospital stay (mean: 8.40 vs 13.39 days; P < 0.001). The two groups did not differ significantly in disease-free (P = 0.701) or overall survival (P = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: MILR produced better perioperative and comparable oncologic outcomes than COLR for HCC. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
|
Authors | Dai Hoon Han, Sung Hoon Choi, Eun Jung Park, Dae Ryong Kang, Gi Hong Choi, Jin Sub Choi |
Journal | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS
(Int J Med Robot)
Vol. 12
Issue 4
Pg. 735-742
(Dec 2016)
ISSN: 1478-596X [Electronic] England |
PMID | 26537176
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Topics |
- Aged
- Blood Loss, Surgical
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
(surgery)
- Case-Control Studies
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Hepatectomy
(methods)
- Humans
- Laparoscopy
(methods)
- Length of Stay
- Liver
(surgery)
- Liver Neoplasms
(surgery)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
(methods)
- Multivariate Analysis
- Propensity Score
- Robotic Surgical Procedures
(methods)
- Treatment Outcome
|