A Grouped Up-and-Down Method Used for Efficacy Comparison Between Two Different Defibrillation Waveforms.

Abstract

Electrical defibrillation, which consists of delivering a therapeutic dose of the electrical current to the fibrillating heart with the aid of a defibrillator, is still the only effective way to treat life-threatening ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, the efficacy of electrical therapy for terminating VF is highly dependent on the waveform applied. When new defibrillation waveforms or techniques are developed, their efficacy needs to be accurately evaluated and compared to those in use. A common method for the comparison of defibrillation efficacy is to estimate and compare the individual defibrillation threshold (DFT) by constructing dose response curves or using an up-and-down method. Since DFT is calculated by repetitive and sequential shocks, there will be variability for each measurement and for each individual. This creates a considerable uncertainty for paired comparison. In this paper, a novel grouped up-and-down method is developed for the comparison of defibrillation efficacy between two different defibrillation waveforms or techniques. The efficacy of two commonly used biphasic defibrillation waveforms was compared in a porcine model of cardiac arrest using the developed method. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is more sensitive for efficacy comparison and requires less defibrillation attempts compared with traditional DFT methods.

• Authors: Danian Jin, Jianjie Wang, Kecheng Yang, Kaifa Wang, Weilun Quan, Ulrich Herken, Yongqin Li
• Journal: IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering (IEEE Trans Biomed Eng) Vol. 63 Issue 2 Pg. 385-91 (Feb 2016) ISSN: 1558-2531 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 26208263 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)

Topics

• Animals
• Electric Countershock (methods)
• Heart Arrest (therapy)
• Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
• Swine
• Ventricular Fibrillation (therapy)