HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Outcome measurement has been shown to improve performance in several fields of healthcare. This understanding has driven a growing interest in value-based healthcare, where value is defined as outcomes achieved per money spent. While low back pain (LBP) constitutes an enormous burden of disease, no universal set of metrics has yet been accepted to measure and compare outcomes. Here, we aim to define such a set.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
An international group of 22 specialists in several disciplines of spine care was assembled to review literature and select LBP outcome metrics through a 6-round modified Delphi process. The scope of the outcome set was degenerative lumbar conditions.
RESULTS:
Patient-reported metrics include numerical pain scales, lumbar-related function using the Oswestry disability index, health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, and questions assessing work status and analgesic use. Specific common and serious complications are included. Recommended follow-up intervals include 6, 12, and 24 months after initiating treatment, with optional follow-up at 3 months and 5 years. Metrics for risk stratification are selected based on pre-existing tools.
INTERPRETATION:
The outcome measures recommended here are structured around specific etiologies of LBP, span a patient's entire cycle of care, and allow for risk adjustment. Thus, when implemented, this set can be expected to facilitate meaningful comparisons and ultimately provide a continuous feedback loop, enabling ongoing improvements in quality of care. Much work lies ahead in implementation, revision, and validation of this set, but it is an essential first step toward establishing a community of LBP providers focused on maximizing the value of the care we deliver.
AuthorsR Carter Clement, Adina Welander, Caleb Stowell, Thomas D Cha, John L Chen, Michelle Davies, Jeremy C Fairbank, Kevin T Foley, Martin Gehrchen, Olle Hagg, Wilco C Jacobs, Richard Kahler, Safdar N Khan, Isador H Lieberman, Beth Morisson, Donna D Ohnmeiss, Wilco C Peul, Neal H Shonnard, Matthew W Smuck, Tore K Solberg, Bjorn H Stromqvist, Miranda L Van Hooff, Ajay D Wasan, Paul C Willems, William Yeo, Peter Fritzell
JournalActa orthopaedica (Acta Orthop) Vol. 86 Issue 5 Pg. 523-33 ( 2015) ISSN: 1745-3682 [Electronic] Sweden
PMID25828191 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Topics
  • Delphi Technique
  • Humans
  • Low Back Pain (therapy)
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care (methods)
  • Pain Management (standards)
  • Pain Measurement (methods)
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: