HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (GEMOXEL) compared with gemcitabine alone in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a randomized phase II study.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Single-agent gemcitabine (GEM) has been considered for many years as the standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, recently, several studies reported encouraging activity and good tolerability for some combination regimens. Considering the apparently non-overlapping toxicity and the proved individual efficacy of GEM, oxaliplatin (L-OHP), and capecitabine (CAP), this randomized phase II study compared the activity and safety of the combination GEM, L-OHP, and CAP (GEMOXEL) versus GEM alone, in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The treatment in GEMOXEL arm consisted of GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, L-OHP 100 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 2, and CAP 1,500 mg/m(2)/day in two divided doses on days 1-14, every 21 days (one cycle). In both treatment groups, GEM was administered weekly for seven consecutive weeks followed by 1-week rest for the first 8 weeks, and thereafter, GEM was continued on days 1, 8, 15, every 28 days. Chemotherapy was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
RESULTS:
Sixty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Thirty-four were randomly assigned to GEMOXEL and 33 to GEM. At 4 months, disease control rate was 79.4% with GEMOXEL versus 45.4 % with GEM (p = 0.004). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.3-7.3 months) in GEMOXEL arm and 3.7 months (95% CI 2.9-4.7 months) in GEM arm (p < 0.001). The median OS was 11.9 months (95% CI 10.6-12.9 months) in GEMOXEL arm and 7.1 months (95% CI 5.5-9.1 months) in GEM arm (p < 0.001). Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was more severe with combination chemotherapy, yet still tolerable. No grade 4 adverse events were observed with either regimen.
CONCLUSION:
GEMOXEL regimen seemed to be safe and more efficient than the standard therapy with GEM alone in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.
AuthorsRoberto Petrioli, Giandomenico Roviello, Anna Ida Fiaschi, Letizia Laera, Daniele Marrelli, Franco Roviello, Edoardo Francini
JournalCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology (Cancer Chemother Pharmacol) Vol. 75 Issue 4 Pg. 683-90 (Apr 2015) ISSN: 1432-0843 [Electronic] Germany
PMID25618415 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Deoxycytidine
  • Capecitabine
  • Fluorouracil
  • Gemcitabine
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Capecitabine
  • Deoxycytidine (administration & dosage, adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Fluorouracil (administration & dosage, adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Organoplatinum Compounds (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms (drug therapy, pathology)
  • Gemcitabine

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: