[Comparison of different continuous positive airway pressure titration methods for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome].

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To explore whether there were differences between the results of automatic titration and the results of manual titration for positive airway pressure treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and its influencing factors, the results might provide a theoretical basis for the rational use of two pressure titration methods.

METHODS:

Sixty one patients with OSAHS were included in this study. All patients underwent a manual titration and an automatic titration within one week. The clinical informations, polysomnography data, and the results of both two titration of all patients were obtained for analysis.

RESULTS:

The overall apnea/hypopnea index was (63.1 ± 17.7)/h, with a range of 14.9/h to 110.4/h. The treatment pressure of manual titration was (8.4 ± 2.1) cmH(2)O, which was significantly lower than the treatment pressure of automatic titration, (11.5 ± 2.7) cmH(2)O (t = -9.797, P < 0.001). After using a ΔP of 3 cmH(2)O for the cutoff value (ΔP was defined as the difference of automatic titration and manual titration), it was found that the pressure of automatic titration was significantly higher in patients with a ΔP > 3 cmH(2)O than in patients with a ΔP ≤ 3 cmH(2)O, which was (13.3 ± 2.3) cmH(2)O vs (10.0 ± 2.0) cmH(2)O (t = -6.159, P < 0.001). However, there were no differences for the pressure of manual titration between these two groups, which was (8.6 ± 2.4) cmH(2)O vs (8.3 ± 2.0)cmH(2)O (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, neck circumference, abdomen circumference, apnea hypopnea index, and arterial oxygen saturation between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The treatment pressure of automatic titration is usually higher than that of manual titration. For patients with a high treatment pressure which is derived from automatic titration, a suggestion about manual titration could be given to decrease the potential treatment pressure of continuous positive airway pressure, which may be helpful in improving the comfortableness and the compliance of this treatment.

• Authors: Jingjing Li, Jingying Ye, Peng Zhang, Dan Kang, Xin Cao, Yuhuan Zhang, Xiu Ding, Li Zheng, Hongguang Li, Qiuli Bian
• Journal: Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery (Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi) Vol. 49 Issue 10 Pg. 839-43 (Oct 2014) ISSN: 1673-0860 [Print] China
• PMID: 25567440 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)

Topics

• Body Mass Index
• Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (methods)
• Humans
• Oximetry
• Patient Compliance
• Polysomnography
• Pressure
• Sleep Apnea, Obstructive (therapy)