Abstract | BACKGROUND: We assessed the robustness of passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) plans for patients in a phase II trial of PSPT for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by using the worst-case scenario method, and compared the worst-case dose distributions with the appearance of locally recurrent lesions. METHODS: Worst-case dose distributions were generated for each of 9 patients who experienced recurrence after concurrent chemotherapy and PSPT to 74 Gy(RBE) for stage III NSCLC by simulating and incorporating uncertainties associated with set-up, respiration-induced organ motion, and proton range in the planning process. The worst-case CT scans were then fused with the positron emission tomography (PET) scans to locate the recurrence. RESULTS: Although the volumes enclosed by the prescription isodose lines in the worst-case dose distributions were consistently smaller than enclosed volumes in the nominal plans, the target dose coverage was not significantly affected: only one patient had a recurrence outside the prescription isodose lines in the worst-case plan. CONCLUSIONS: PSPT is a relatively robust technique. Local recurrence was not associated with target underdosage resulting from estimated uncertainties in 8 of 9 cases.
|
Authors | Zhengfei Zhu, Wei Liu, Michael Gillin, Daniel R Gomez, Ritsuko Komaki, James D Cox, Radhe Mohan, Joe Y Chang |
Journal | Radiation oncology (London, England)
(Radiat Oncol)
Vol. 9
Pg. 108
(May 06 2014)
ISSN: 1748-717X [Electronic] England |
PMID | 24886059
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
|
Topics |
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
(pathology, radiotherapy)
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Lung Neoplasms
(pathology, radiotherapy)
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
(diagnosis)
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Prospective Studies
- Proton Therapy
- Retrospective Studies
- Survival Rate
|