HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Potential pitfalls of crossover and thoughts on iniparib in triple-negative breast cancer.

Abstract
As recruitment for oncology clinical trials has become more difficult, there appears to have been an increase in the number of studies that allow patients in the control arm to "crossover" and receive the experimental therapy after disease progression. Although some researchers worry that allowing such crossover may abolish gains in progression-free survival in the experimental arm, the possibility that crossover might inadvertently benefit the experimental arm has not been addressed. In clinical trials in which the experimental agent has little or no intrinsic activity and is used to modulate an active combination, such crossover might negatively affect the overall survival of the control arm. Because resistance to the active combination--manifested as disease progression--has occurred, the likelihood of benefit from adding the experimental drug is reduced. Consequently, patients who were randomly assigned to the control arm continue to receive the now inactive combination after crossover, whereas patients in the experimental arm who discontinue study participation may seek out potentially effective salvage regimens. This difference in subsequent therapies may confer an advantage to the experimental arm that is manifested as gains beyond those achieved in progression-free survival, gains that occur not because the experimental therapy induced a change in tumor biology that persists beyond treatment discontinuation but because the control arm suffers by continuing to receive a therapy on which their tumor is progressing. Such an outcome may explain the recently reported trial results for iniparib in triple-negative breast cancer. Given that allowing patients in the control arm to receive the experimental agent may confound interpretation of overall survival, such crossover should not be used indiscriminately, especially if the experimental agent has little or no intrinsic activity.
AuthorsTito Fojo, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Susan E Bates
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute (J Natl Cancer Inst) Vol. 103 Issue 23 Pg. 1738-40 (Dec 07 2011) ISSN: 1460-2105 [Electronic] United States
PMID22045362 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural, Review)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Benzamides
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Indoles
  • Pyrroles
  • iniparib
  • Interferon-gamma
  • Sunitinib
Topics
  • Antineoplastic Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Benzamides (therapeutic use)
  • Biomarkers, Tumor (analysis)
  • Breast Neoplasms (chemistry, drug therapy, genetics, mortality, pathology)
  • Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Disease Progression
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Indoles (therapeutic use)
  • Interferon-gamma (therapeutic use)
  • Neoplasms (chemistry, drug therapy)
  • Patient Selection
  • Pyrroles (therapeutic use)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Research Design
  • Sunitinib
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: