Abstract | INTRODUCTION: No studies as yet have directly evaluated the patients' perspective of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Here, we determine patient satisfaction, understanding, and perception of CEA. METHODS: Consecutive patients were identified from a prospectively maintained carotid database. A validated 10-point telephone questionnaire was conducted. Questions related to preoperative symptoms, experience of procedure, future interventions, and overall patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 192 patients included, 136 completed the questionnaire (71% response rate). Ninety-two percent were satisfied with the explanation received, however, only 48% understood that CEA aimed to prevent future stroke. Eighty-five percent of patients received local anesthesia (LA) CEA, with 16% reporting severe or unbearable pain. Most patients (83%) would repeat CEA if necessary and 67% stated a future preference for LA CEA. The majority of patients (96%) were satisfied with their treatment overall. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were satisfied with CEA. Greater emphasis could be placed on improving preoperative information-giving and intraoperative analgesia.
|
Authors | Mahiben Maruthappu, Joseph Shalhoub, Ankur Thapar, Gayani Jayasooriya, Ian J Franklin, Alun H Davies |
Journal | Vascular and endovascular surgery
(Vasc Endovascular Surg)
Vol. 44
Issue 7
Pg. 529-34
(Oct 2010)
ISSN: 1938-9116 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 20675333
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Analgesia
- Anesthesia, Local
- Carotid Stenosis
(complications, surgery)
- Comprehension
- Endarterectomy, Carotid
(adverse effects, psychology)
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Humans
- Informed Consent
- Intraoperative Care
- London
- Pain Measurement
- Pain, Postoperative
(etiology)
- Patient Education as Topic
- Patient Satisfaction
- Patients
(psychology)
- Perception
- Quality of Health Care
- Stroke
(etiology, prevention & control)
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Treatment Outcome
|