Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: RESULTS: The ELISA assay predicted CVD more strongly [Relative Hazard, RH=1.8; p=0.045, at the 85th Lipoprotein(a) percentile] than the IT assay (RH=1.3; p=0.37). The PPV for LMW isoforms using the ELISA (Whites, 98%; Blacks, 90%) were much higher than the IT assay (Whites, 75%; Blacks, 68%). Relative to the ELISA assay values, a positive bias in the IT assay values was seen for participants with larger apolipoprotein(a) isoforms, which may explain these findings. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | J Craig Longenecker, Josef Coresh, Michael J Klag, Neil R Powe, Nancy E Fink, Santica M Marcovina |
Journal | Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry
(Clin Chim Acta)
Vol. 397
Issue 1-2
Pg. 36-41
(Nov 2008)
ISSN: 0009-8981 [Print] Netherlands |
PMID | 18692032
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Apolipoproteins A
- Lipoprotein(a)
- Protein Isoforms
|
Topics |
- Apolipoproteins A
(blood)
- Cardiovascular Diseases
(diagnosis)
- Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel
(methods)
- Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
- Female
- Humans
- Lipoprotein(a)
(blood)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Nephelometry and Turbidimetry
(methods)
- Protein Isoforms
(blood)
- Renal Dialysis
- Sensitivity and Specificity
|