HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Quality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial).

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Chronic back and leg pain conditions result in patients' loss of function, reduced quality of life and increased costs to the society.
AIMS:
To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cost implications of spinal cord stimulation plus non-surgical conventional medical management (SCS group) versus non-surgical conventional medical management alone (CMM group) in the management of neuropathic pain in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.
METHODS:
A total of 100 patients were randomised to either the SCS or CMM group. Healthcare resource consumption data relating to screening, the use of the implantable generator in SCS patients, hospital stay, and drug and non-drug pain-related treatment were collected prospectively. Resource consumption was costed using UK and Canadian 2005-2006 national figures. HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire. Costs and outcomes were assessed for each patient over their first 6-months of the trial.
RESULTS:
The 6-month mean total healthcare cost in the SCS group (CAN$19,486; 12,653 euros) was significantly higher than in the CMM group (CAN$3994; 2594 euros), with a mean adjusted difference of CAN$15,395 (9997 euros) (p<0.001). However, the gain in HRQoL with SCS over the same period of time was markedly greater in the SCS group, with a mean EQ-5D score difference of 0.25 [p<0.001] and 0.21 [p<0.001], respectively at 3- and 6-months after adjusting for baseline variables.
CONCLUSIONS:
The addition of SCS to CMM in patients with neuropathic leg and back pain results in higher costs to health systems but also generates important improvements in patients' EQ-5D over the same period.
AuthorsAndrea Manca, Krishna Kumar, Rod S Taylor, Line Jacques, Sam Eldabe, Mario Meglio, Joan Molet, Simon Thomson, Jim O'Callaghan, Elon Eisenberg, Germain Milbouw, Eric Buchser, Gianpaolo Fortini, Jonathan Richardson, Rebecca J Taylor, Ron Goeree, Mark J Sculpher
JournalEuropean journal of pain (London, England) (Eur J Pain) Vol. 12 Issue 8 Pg. 1047-58 (Nov 2008) ISSN: 1532-2149 [Electronic] England
PMID18359255 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Analgesics
Topics
  • Analgesics (economics, therapeutic use)
  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy (economics, statistics & numerical data)
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs (statistics & numerical data, trends)
  • Health Resources (economics, statistics & numerical data)
  • Health Status
  • Hospitalization (statistics & numerical data)
  • Humans
  • Israel
  • Longevity
  • Low Back Pain (economics, psychology, therapy)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurosurgical Procedures (adverse effects)
  • Patient Satisfaction (statistics & numerical data)
  • Peripheral Nervous System Diseases (economics, psychology, therapy)
  • Postoperative Complications (economics, psychology, therapy)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life (psychology)
  • Spinal Cord (physiology, surgery)
  • Spinal Diseases (surgery)
  • Spine (pathology, physiopathology, surgery)
  • Syndrome
  • Treatment Failure

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: