HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Unintentional intrapleural insertion of an epidural catheter: should we remove it or leave it in situ to provide perioperative analgesia?

Abstract
We report three patients who had intrapleural insertion of an intended thoracic epidural catheter. These misplaced catheters were used for local anesthetic administration. Bupivacaine injection via these catheters in two cases was effective for reducing postoperative pain. We conclude that if an intended thoracic epidural catheter is found to be in the intrapleural cavity at the time of surgery and if correct replacement of the catheter into the epidural space is not believed to be feasible after surgery, then the administration of local anesthetic through the intrapleural catheter could be considered as a potential alterative analgesic method.
AuthorsSatoki Inoue, Naoko Nishimine, Hitoshi Furuya
JournalAnesthesia and analgesia (Anesth Analg) Vol. 100 Issue 1 Pg. 266-268 (Jan 2005) ISSN: 0003-2999 [Print] United States
PMID15616089 (Publication Type: Case Reports, Journal Article)
Topics
  • Aged
  • Analgesia, Epidural (adverse effects)
  • Biopsy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung (pathology, surgery)
  • Lung Neoplasms (surgery)
  • Male
  • Medical Errors
  • Pain, Postoperative (therapy)
  • Pleura (injuries)
  • Thoracotomy

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: