HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Amphotericin B lipid complex as prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing induction chemotherapy.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The optimal antifungal prophylactic regimen for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing induction chemotherapy has yet to be identified. A prospective historical control study evaluated the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in this patient population.
METHODS:
Newly diagnosed patients with AML or high-risk MDS who were undergoing induction chemotherapy received prophylactic ABLC 2.5 mg/kg intravenously 3 times weekly. This treatment group was compared with a historical control group that had similar baseline characteristics and received prophylactic liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) 3 mg/kg 3 times weekly. The primary endpoint was the incidence of documented or suspected fungal infections during and up to 4 weeks after cessation of prophylaxis. Reported adverse events were used to assess tolerability.
RESULTS:
The overall efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis was similar in patients who received ABLC and patients who received L-AmB (P=0.95). Among 131 ABLC-treated patients and 70 L-AmB-treated patients who were assessed for efficacy and safety, 49% of patients in each group completed therapy without developing a documented or suspected fungal infection. Documented fungal infections occurred in 5% of ABLC-treated patients and in 4% of L-AmB-treated patients. Alternative antifungal strategies were required because of persistent fever or pneumonia of unknown pathogen in 28% and 32% of ABLC-treated and L-AmB-treated patients, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events, therapy discontinuations due to adverse events, and survival rates also were similar between treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
ABLC and L-AmB appeared to have similar efficacy and were tolerated well as antifungal prophylaxis in patients with AML and high-risk MDS who were undergoing induction chemotherapy.
AuthorsGloria N Mattiuzzi, Hagop Kantarjian, Stefan Faderl, JoAnn Lim, Dimitrios Kontoyiannis, Deborah Thomas, William Wierda, Isaam Raad, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Xian Zhou, Alexandra Ferrajoli, Nebiyou Bekele, Elihu Estey
JournalCancer (Cancer) Vol. 100 Issue 3 Pg. 581-9 (Feb 01 2004) ISSN: 0008-543X [Print] United States
PMID14745876 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
Chemical References
  • Liposomes
  • Amphotericin B
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Amphotericin B (administration & dosage)
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Fungemia (etiology, prevention & control)
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Liposomes
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Primary Prevention (methods)
  • Probability
  • Prognosis
  • Remission Induction
  • Risk Assessment
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: