HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 25 years even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients, if their survival prognosis is limited, should be adequate palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy in extensive SCLC compared with best supportive care (BSC) or placebo treatment.
SEARCH STRATEGY:
Medline (1966-Jan 2003), Embase (1974-Jan 2003), Cancerlit (1993-Jan 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 4, 2002) were searched. In addition experts in the field were contacted to identify further studies not found by electronic searches.
SELECTION CRITERIA:
Randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with a placebo group or best supportive care in patients with extensive stage SCLC.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently by two reviewers and disagreements were resolved by a third author. Additional information on the included studies was obtained from the author of the original studies.
MAIN RESULTS:
Only two studies (the first published in 1977 and the second in 1982) met the inclusion criteria of the review. A total of 65 patients with extensive disease (33 in the first study and 32 in the second) were randomised to received either placebo treatment or ifosfamide. In the second study a third arm of comparison included ifosfamide plus CCNU. Ifosfamide gave an extra 78.5 days survival (mean survival time) compared with the placebo group. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group. Pooled analysis was not possible because only mean survival time was reported in both studies for patients with extensive disease.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS:
Chemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in comparison with placebo in patients with advanced SCLC. Nevertheless the impact of chemotherapy on quality of life and in patients with poor prognosis is unknown. Well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer.
AuthorsY Agra, M Pelayo, M Sacristan, A Sacristán, C Serra, X Bonfill
JournalThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Cochrane Database Syst Rev) Issue 4 Pg. CD001990 ( 2003) ISSN: 1469-493X [Electronic] England
PMID14583943 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review, Systematic Review)
Chemical References
  • Lomustine
  • Ifosfamide
Topics
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (therapeutic use)
  • Carcinoma, Small Cell (drug therapy, pathology)
  • Humans
  • Ifosfamide (therapeutic use)
  • Lomustine (therapeutic use)
  • Lung Neoplasms (drug therapy)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: