HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

[Undercutting decompression versus laminectomy. Clinical and radiological results of a prospective controlled trial].

Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after laminectomy or undercutting decompression in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) without apparent signs of instability. In a prospective controlled, nonrandomized trial 1 year after operation, two groups of patients were compared. Out of 85 consecutive patients, treated from 1998 to 1999 in an orthopedic university clinic for symptomatic LSS, decompression without simultaneous fusion was performed in 40 cases. In group I ( n=13) a laminectomy was done and in group II ( n=27) an undercutting of the vertebral arch and facet joints. The main outcome measure was the Oswestry Low Back Disability Score. Subjective complaints, visual analog scale (VAS), claudication distance, analgesic demands, and radiomorphometric parameters following the procedure of Dupuis and Nash/Moe at 6 and at 12 months after the operation were secondary objective criteria. One year postoperatively the main outcome measure showed no significant difference between the two groups, although group II had shown better results ( p=0.0195) 6 months postoperatively. The required analgesics could be significantly lowered in group II compared with group I at 12 months ( p=0.0011). The remaining secondary outcome measures showed no statistically significant differences. The extent of decompression in LSS without apparent instability did not influence the outcome. If there is any doubt intraoperatively about the adequate amount of decompression of the lumbar spinal canal, undercutting decompression should be extended to laminectomy without fear of consecutive segmental instability.
AuthorsK S Delank, P Eysel, J Zöllner, P Drees, B Nafe, J D Rompe
JournalDer Orthopade (Orthopade) Vol. 31 Issue 11 Pg. 1048-56; discussion 1057 (Nov 2002) ISSN: 0085-4530 [Print] Germany
Vernacular Title"Undercutting decompression" vs. Laminektomie Klinische und radiologische Ergebnisse einer prospektiv-kontrollierten Studie.
PMID12436323 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article)
Topics
  • Aged
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Decompression, Surgical
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Laminectomy
  • Lumbar Vertebrae (surgery)
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiography
  • Spinal Fusion
  • Spinal Stenosis (diagnostic imaging, surgery)
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: