HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Oral trofosfamide and etoposide in pediatric patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Glioblastoma multiforme in childhood is rare, and the prognosis for patients with the disease is poor. The Pediatric Oncology Society of the Germanic language group (GPOH) enrolls patients in a series of pilot trials, the first of which is reported here (HIT-GBM-A).
METHODS:
Twenty-two patients with glioblastoma multiforme, World Health Organization Grade 4, between the ages of 3-15 years (45% male) were enrolled during the period 1995-1997. There were 13 supratentorial tumors, 8 brainstem tumors, and 1 cerebellar tumor. The patients underwent the following procedures: stereotactic biopsy (n = 3 patients), open biopsy (n = 1 patient), partial resection (n = 6 patients), subtotal resection (n = 4 patients), and macroscopic total resection (n = 8 patients). Adjuvant treatment consisted of oral chemotherapy with trofosfamide, 100 mg/m(2), and etoposide, 25 mg/m(2), daily or for 21-day cycles interrupted by 1-week rests. Standard fractionated radiation (54 grays) was started concurrently with the first cycle.
RESULTS:
The chemotherapy was well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths and only minor side effects. The responses in 12 evaluable patients after two cycles were as follows: 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 3 patients with stable disease, and 7 patients with progressive disease. The median overall survival was 12 months. The 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year overall survival rates were 52%, 26%, and 22%, respectively, and the event free survival rates were 26%, 22%, and 4%, respectively. None of the four surviving patients (3.2 years, 3.4 years, 4.0 years, and 4.2 years after diagnosis) is event free. Two patients are alive after tumor progression: One patient was diagnosed with a medulloblastoma, and one patient was diagnosed with an osteosarcoma as second malignancies. A control group extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data had lower survival rates: the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.26).
CONCLUSIONS:
This chemotherapy will not be used in a randomized trial of patients with glioblastoma; however, it may be evaluated for patients with tumors that have more chemoresponsive histologies.
AuthorsJ E Wolff, G Mölenkamp, S Westphal, T Pietsch, A Gnekow, R D Kortmann, J Kuehl
JournalCancer (Cancer) Vol. 89 Issue 10 Pg. 2131-7 (Nov 15 2000) ISSN: 0008-543X [Print] United States
PMID11066055 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright 2000 American Cancer Society.
Chemical References
  • Etoposide
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • trofosfamide
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adolescent
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (therapeutic use)
  • Brain Stem Neoplasms (drug therapy, mortality)
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cyclophosphamide (administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Etoposide (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Female
  • Glioblastoma (drug therapy, mortality)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pilot Projects
  • Postoperative Care
  • Supratentorial Neoplasms (drug therapy, mortality)
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: