Ankle-foot orthosis with an oil damper versus nonarticulated ankle-foot orthosis in the gait of patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Gait improvement in patients with stroke has been examined in terms of use or non-use of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), but the effects of different kinds of AFOs remain unclear. In this study, the effect on gait of using an AFO with an oil damper (AFO-OD), which has plantarflexion stiffness without dorsiflexion resistance, was compared with a nonarticulated AFO, which has both dorsiflexion and plantarflexion stiffness, in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS:

Forty-one patients (31 men, 10 women; mean age 58.4 ± 11.3 years) in the subacute phase of stroke were randomly allocated to two groups to undergo gait training for 1 h daily over 2 weeks by physiotherapists while wearing an AFO-OD or a nonarticulated AFO. A motion capture system was utilized to measure shod gait without orthosis at baseline and after training with the allocated AFO. Data analysis focused on the joint kinematics and kinetics, spatial and temporal parameters, ground reaction force, and shank-to-vertical angle. Unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was performed to clarify the difference in gait with an AFO between the two AFO groups after training, with a significance level of p = 0.05.

RESULTS:

Thirty-six patients completed the study (17 in the AFO-OD group and 19 in the nonarticulated AFO group). The ankle joint was more dorsiflexed in single stance (p = 0.008, effect size r = 0.46) and peak ankle power absorption was larger in stance (p = 0.007, r = 0.55) in the AFO-OD group compared with the nonarticulated AFO group. Peak power absorption varied among patients in the AFO-OD group. Increased dorsiflexion angles were also found at initial contact (p = 0.008, r = 1.51), pre-swing (p = 0.045, r = 0.91), and the swing phase (p = 0.045, r = 0.91) in the AFO-OD group. There was no difference in peak plantarflexion moment, ankle power generation, spatial or temporal parameters, ground reaction force, or shank-to-vertical angle between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study showed that an AFO with plantarflexion stiffness but without dorsiflexion resistance produced greater improvement in ankle joint kinematics and kinetics compared with the nonarticulated AFO, but the results of peak power absorption varied greatly among patients. Trial registration UMIN000028126, Registered 1 August 2017, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/icdr/ctr_menu_form_reg.cgi?recptno=R000032197.

• Authors: Sumiko Yamamoto, Naoyuki Motojima, Yosuke Kobayashi, Yuji Osada, Souji Tanaka, Aliyeh Daryabor
• Journal: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation (J Neuroeng Rehabil) Vol. 19 Issue 1 Pg. 50 (05 26 2022) ISSN: 1743-0003 [Electronic] England
• PMID: 35619141 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
• Copyright: © 2022. The Author(s).

Topics

• Aged
• Ankle
• Ankle Joint
• Female
• Foot Orthoses
• Gait
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Stroke (complications)