Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) have been shown to improve outcomes in studies of multiple malignancies by effects on the tumor microenvironment to enhance the immune repertoire and improve drug delivery. Repurposing RASi to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may improve survival coupled with tolerability and cost efficacy. We evaluated the impact of RASi on outcomes in mRCC patients receiving ICI.

METHODS:

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included mRCC patients treated with ICI with or without RASi. The patients from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) were used as a discovery cohort, and the patients from University of California San Diego (UCSD) were used for validation. Receipt of an ICI (PD1/L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors) was required. RASi use was defined as receipt of a RASi at baseline and for a minimum of 30 days after ICI initiation. For both the discovery and validation cohorts, the primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS:

Overall, 229 patients who received an ICI were included: 100 patients from DFCI and 129 patients from UCSD. Concomitant RASi were administered in 30 patients (30%) in the DFCI cohort and 59 (45%) in the UCSD cohort. Median age at ICI initiation was 62.5 years in both cohorts. Median follow-up was 3.8 [IQR 3-5.3] years in the DFCI cohort, and 2.3 [IQR 1.4-3.6] years in the UCSD cohort. In the DFCI cohort, RASi was significantly associated with longer OS (adjusted-HR 0.35 [95% CI, 0.17-0.70], P = .003) and TTF (adjusted-HR 0.57 [0.36-0.92], P = .02). In the validation cohort, RASi was associated with TTF (adjusted HR, 0.60 [0.39-0.92], P = .02) and not statistically associated with OS (adjusted-HR 0.60 [0.34-1.06], P = .07). The propensity analysis, matching 83 patients from both cohorts receiving RASi while on ICI with 83 who did not, showed that RASi significantly improved OS (HR 0.59 [0.37-0.95], P = .03) and TTF (HR 0.60 [0.43-0.85], P = .0034).

CONCLUSIONS:

RASi was associated with improved OS and TTF in mRCC patients receiving ICI. This provides a rationale for prospective randomized studies combining ICI and RASi in mRCC patients.

• Authors: Pier Vitale Nuzzo, Elio Adib, Nicole Weise, Catherine Curran, Tyler Stewart, Dory Freeman, Amin H Nassar, Sarah Abou Alaiwi, Ziad Bakouny, Bradley A McGregor, Toni K Choueiri, Rakesh K Jain, Rana R McKay, Guru Sonpavde
• Journal: Clinical genitourinary cancer (Clin Genitourin Cancer) Vol. 20 Issue 4 Pg. 301-306 (08 2022) ISSN: 1938-0682 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 35614012 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Chemical References

• Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
• Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Topics

• Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (therapeutic use)
• Carcinoma, Renal Cell (drug therapy)
• Humans
• Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (therapeutic use)
• Kidney Neoplasms (drug therapy)
• Prospective Studies
• Renin-Angiotensin System
• Retrospective Studies
• Tumor Microenvironment